[Chapter-delegates] ICANN Accountability was Re: Internet Society Appointments to theNTIA/IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group

[Narelle Clark]

Hi all
at the risk of annoying people by being pedantic, can I ask that this
thread be split into ICANN accountability (or other) topics, and the issues
for the NTIA/IANA Stewardiship Transition be kept on this or other suitably
named subject line?

Clearly one MAJOR issue for the co-ordinating group is to keep the issues
sets cleanly delineated - or to respond appropriately to the community if
it feels the issues can't be separated.

To my mind - at this stage - ICANN's accountability issues lie within
ICANN's policy remit and shouldn't affect the strict operational questions
of IANA.

If you want to keep them together, let me know, but at this stage it would
seem important to delineate and separate these particular issues for the
sake of the database.

btw - a huge thanks to those well wishers. I am actually more impressed by
the honour you grant by your collective intelligence and wisdom.



Narelle


On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Evan Leibovitch <evan at telly.org> wrote:

> Given that the interests of registrants and end users are not in sync -- a
> number of examples have been provided above -- I welcome mention of any
> policy initiatives or positions in which any ICANN GNSO stakeholder group
> has visibly sided with the interests of non-registrant end users over those
> of registrants.
>
> One will do.
>
> It's easy to say that the constituencies are designed to serve users, but
> that's only when the interests of end-users and registrants are
> conveniently aligned.
>
> In areas where they are not ... such as pressing ICANN compliance to
> enforce its rules, shut down the domains of bad actors, demand accurate
> WHOIS information, insist on Public Interest Commitments that aren't crap,
> admit that protecting Red Cross strings as trademarks isn't such a bad
> idea, demand end-user-centric metrics, or even dare once suggest that the
> gTLD expansion, in its then-current form, was "unacceptable" to the public
> interest ... At-Large has stood alone, with little support of other
> constituencies that claim to represent users. This can be verified.
>
> It is in these areas -- those in which we must ascertain and advocate the
> needs of the billions who have not ever bought a domain name and never will
> -- the support of ISOC will be most helpful going forward,
>
> The GNSO constituencies may charter themselves as they like, but ICANN
> Bylaw XI.2.4.a is about as explicit as it gets:
>
> *The At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) is the primary organizational home
> within ICANN for individual Internet users. *
>
>


-- 



Narelle Clark
President and Board Member
Internet Society of Australia
ph: 0412 297 043
int ph: +61 412 297 043
narelle at isoc-au.org.au <president at isoc-au.org.au>
www.isoc-au.org.au
The Internet is for Everyone!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20140710/6778dd5c/attachment.htm>