[Chapter-delegates] Proposed charter of the Chapter Advisory Council

[CW Mail]

Well, you seem to be living on another planet.

> we believed that a good combination of newcomers and experienced leaders would be the most effective composition ...

These considerations are of no concern to the steering group. They are a matter for the Chapters themselves.

> …  leaving open the delegate slot for an up-and-coming individual

Would that we had any. The net result of four years of inaction and indecision is that individual membership of Chapters has become unsaleable.


CW



On 13 Dec 2014, at 14:02, Eric Burger <eburger at standardstrack.com> wrote:

> Evan -
> I would suggest you include language or a FAQ that expresses this sentiment:
> 
>> On Dec 13, 2014, at 1:30 AM, Evan Leibovitch <evan at telly.org> wrote:
> [snip]
>> Given the nature of the work and the complexity of Internet Governance, we believed that a good combination of newcomers and experienced leaders would be the most effective composition for the officers (and indeed the Steering Committee as well).
> 
> By reading the draft charter, I had no idea this was the goal. The reason I would not want a strict rule is because I totally agree with this:
> 
>> To do this we need to trust the Chapter delegates themselves to determine how best to do this each year from among the available candidates.
> 
> I would not want to dictate to any particular chapter how to select its delegate, but I do like the theory behind this:
> 
>> Because of this, we deliberately chose  to require all leaders to be re-elected every year, to ensure maximum accountability and to enable opportunity for newcomers.
> [snip]
> 
> My concern is that chapters will most likely be inclined to send their best and most experienced member to be their delegate to the council. My question is, how do we get across to chapters that is not necessarily in their best interest? You might say that we all are aware of this from being on this list. But, what about five years from now when we have forgotten and there is a new cadre to chapter leaders?
> 
> One option would be to say that a chapter may not select any officer to be a delegate. The presumption here is the chapter would be selecting its best and most seasoned members for leadership, leaving open the delegate slot for an up-and-comming individual. Moreover, that new person may be able to benefit the most from networking and exposure to what the Internet Society Chapter Support team has to offer. Conversely, if a chapter has an individual who is “president for life,” this would give someone else the opportunity to be involved with the greater Internet Society community.
> _______________________________________________
> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20141214/492bcf2c/attachment.htm>