[Chapter-delegates] Internet data and research

[Shreedeep Rayamajhi]

I think this is a very good initiation started which will further help to
maintain the  credibility, as well as source of the published report
and document.


Cheers to Life
Shreedeep Rayamajhi
00977-9841374547(Nepal)
00977-9851049683(Nepal)
00977-9813900099
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shreedeep_Rayamajhi_(activist)
+1(301)485-9395(US)
<http://www.rayznews.com/>

*DISCLAIMER:* This message is intended only for the recipient. If you are
not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying,
distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this
information is strictly prohibited.


On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Michael Kende <kende at isoc.org> wrote:

>  Many thanks Mark.  Would the validation procedure for part 1 be part 2?
>  My worry is the resources involved in validation of part 1.  To take an
> example from my recent past, I presented a widely used data set on the
> number of Internet users in a variety of countries, and had complaints that
> the number for one of the countries must be wrong – which may have been the
> case, but how would one validate that, and how much would that cost?  As
> for two, since any cutoff rating would be somewhat arbitrary, is it not
> better to simply make the ratings available, and let users decide?
> Thanks
> Michael
>
>   From: <Urban>, "Mark (CDC/OCOO/OCIO/ITSO)" <fka2 at cdc.gov>
> Date: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 at 5:54 PM
> To: Michael Kende <kende at isoc.org>, "chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org" <
> chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org>
> Subject: RE: Internet data and research
>
>   Michael,
>
>
>
> There’s three approaches to aggregate data presentation.  I recommend all
> three be made available:
>
> 1.       Show only sources subject to strict validation procedures
>
> 2.       Allow users to rate sources, and then pick sources > a certain
> rating
>
> 3.       Show all data from all sources.
>
>
>
> The advantages here are that “nonstandard” data sets that the community
> trusts can be included in reports, while new or unvalidated datasets can
> “prove their worth” over time.
>
> Regards,
>
> *Mark D. Urban*
>
> *Vice-Chair, ISOC Disabilities and Special Needs Chapter*
>
>
>
> *From:* chapter-delegates-bounces at elists.isoc.org [
> mailto:chapter-delegates-bounces at elists.isoc.org<chapter-delegates-bounces at elists.isoc.org>]
> *On Behalf Of *Michael Kende
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 26, 2013 10:18 AM
> *To:* chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
> *Subject:* [Chapter-delegates] Internet data and research
>
>
>
> As part of my new role at ISOC, we are launching a new portal on the ISOC
> website that aggregates existing data sources and reports (ours and
> third-party),  The purpose of it is threefold: first, as a public resource
> to learn about the impact of new infrastructure on the Internet, and the
> broader economic impact of the Internet; second, in order to help identify
> gaps in data, and determine how best to fill those gaps; and third, to
> promote new analysis and insights by everyone in the Internet community,
> including ourselves, to further stimulate a better understanding of the
> Internet and its Economy.
>
>
>
> The portal is at.
>
>
>
> https://www.internetsociety.org/internet-data-and-research
>
>
>
> One outstanding issue is whether, and if so how, to exclude bad research
> and data from the list.  On the one hand is a strong desire to be open and
> inclusive of all available data and reports, while on the other hand there
> is a thought that we should review and exclude suspect or biased work. We
> do not have the resources to perform such extensive review on each linked
> item (as of today there are over 200 in the database), and I believe that
> it would be difficult to determine the criteria for excluding work in any
> case.  However, in order to be of most use as a public resource, it would
> be useful to provide information that could help all of us make decisions
> about what data and reports to use.  As a result, we are considering
> including a review section, such as used in Amazon, to rate and provide
> comments from all, including hopefully the authors.  For starters, there
> are two feedback sections, one to send me comments on specific reports, and
> the other to provide suggestions for work that has not yet been included.
>  Thoughts on how to move this forward would be most appreciated.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Michael Kende
> Chief Economist
> Internet Society
> Galerie Jean-Malbuisson 15
> CH-1204 Geneva
> Switzerland
>
> Tel: +41 22 809 0367
> E-mail: kende at isoc.org
> Website: www.internetsociety.org
>
> 'The Internet is for Everyone!'
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20131127/84678973/attachment.htm>