[Chapter-delegates] NEWS RELEASE: ITU World Telecommunication Policy Forum Closes Focused on Continuing Open Dialogue

Fri May 17 22:54:12 PDT 2013

If you are saying that only and only ISOC materials about the topic are
relevant (and I'm not saying that it isn't trustworthy enough nor that ISOC
somehow lies!), than I disagree.

Sorry, but were all of my links press releases? No. If you click on them,
you can see that one was from *American Society of International Law* (that
short (I gave intentionally short ones, because everyone don't have the
time to read 300 pages long and complicated law texts) analyze is one of
the best ones (IF you are saying that i'm "itu-phobic" then I'm not, but
i believe that the truth lies somewhere in the middle), BUT yes, it's not
the whole story).
Other link is from the international institute for strategic studies, which
is a *world-leading authority* on global security, political risk and
military conflict. Another from Center for a New American Security, which
mission "... is to develop strong, pragmatic and principled national
security and defense policies.* Building on the expertise and experience of
its staff and advisors*, CNAS engages policymakers, experts and the public
with innovative,* fact-based research*, ideas and analysis to shape and
elevate the national security debate. A key part of our mission is to
inform and prepare the national security leaders of today and tomorrow."

Other three links are more easier to read, but says more or less the same
thing.

I just finished my university's thesis about the ITU topic ("Internet
governance as an example of efficiency of Decision-making process of The
International Telecommunication Union") and I read many different views.
What I learned about the way? That we can't get an agreement if we can't
agree on the basics, on the terms and what they mean. I chose Wolfgang
Kleinwächter, because he has worked on that field about 20 years, and
because his approach is narrower (including elements that all are agreeing
on - domain name, IP-addresses and root server management) and because in
my opinion he is internationally respected professor.

These links are saying more or less the same things that ISOC are. But
somewhat more humanly readable ways. It is better to have more sources
saying the same thing than just one.

2013/5/18 GABRIEL LATJOR NDOW <md at gambian.com>

> Very informative Saskia,
> Much appreciated.
>
> Gabriel
>
> On May 17, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Saskia Kiisel wrote:
>
> Hello everyone!
>
> People who aren't informed about internet governance situation, I leave
> here some articles, that might clear it for you.
>
> Analyze about the WCIT-12 (World Conference on International
> Telecommunications, Dubai 2012):
> http://www.asil.org/pdfs/insights/insight130207.pdf
>
> http://www.iiss.org/publications/strategic-comments/past-issues/volume-18-2012/december/internets-future-on-the-agenda-at-dubai-meeting/
> http://www.cnas.org/theinternetyalta
>
> Some explaining articles:
>
> http://www.circleid.com/posts/20121217_wcit_and_internet_governance_harmless_resolution_or_trojan_horse/
> http://news.dot-nxt.com/2012/12/14/highlights-and-low-points-wcit
> http://news.dot-nxt.com/2012/12/06/wcit-and-internet-it-all-comes
>
> And because there are many different understanding about the internet
> governance, then here is one of the versions of Kleinwächters (who in my
> opinion is the closest for defining it):
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7c1azN6E4CI (also explains a little bit of
> internet governance history).
>
> Why I'm talking about WCIT-12 and not WTPF? - Well, to understand WTPF it
> is good to know the pre-story for that.
>
> All the best,
>
>
> 2013/5/17 Grace Chng <grace.chng1 at gmail.com>
>
>> I agree.
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On 17 May, 2013, at 5:27 AM, Elver Loho <elver.loho at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I do not mean to sound disrespectful, but could we have human-language
>> > summaries of press releases in the future? From what I can decipher,
>> > governments want more control over the internet, we don't, we won this
>> > time, but we have to continue the fight. Right?
>> >
>> > It took me, like, fifteen minutes to figure this out and I gotta get
>> > up in seven hours to go on live radio to talk about e-voting security
>> > after a local Pirate Party activist stole a public computer from the
>> > parliament building hoping to uncover secret documents proving that
>> > e-voting is rigged and then three weeks later walked into a newspaper
>> > office with it, having not found anything, and is now missing and
>> > wanted by the police, with the computer, and the Pirate Party refuses
>> > to kick him out.
>> >
>> > Here's a photo of him with the famous computer:
>> > http://boards.chan.ee/b/src/1368653567180.jpg
>> >
>> > Anyway, it would save me some time in the future.
>> >
>> > And my actual point is that if we want to engage people, then we need
>> > to communicate in a way that people understand. Considering that
>> > English is not the native language of the vast majority of us, this is
>> > doubly important.
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > Elver
>> >
>> > elver.loho at gmail.com
>> > +372 5661 6933
>> > skype: elver.loho
>> >
>> > On 16 May 2013 23:56, Wende Cover <cover at isoc.org> wrote:
>> >> ITU World Telecommunication Policy Forum Closes Focused on Continuing
>> Open
>> >> Dialogue
>> >>
>> >> [Geneva, Switzerland - 16 May 2013] – Today, the World
>> Telecommunication
>> >> Policy Forum (WTPF) came to a close with robust debate among all
>> >> stakeholders about the role of government in Internet governance.
>> >> Throughout the meeting, the Internet Society participated in dialogue
>> that
>> >> focused on several key areas, including the significant role of
>> Internet
>> >> exchange points as a means of enhancing Internet connectivity, the
>> need for
>> >> timely deployment of IPv6, and the importance of the multi-stakeholder
>> model
>> >> of Internet governance.
>> >>
>> >> Six opinions were drafted by a WTPF Informal Experts Group and
>> submitted to
>> >> the meeting, addressing topics such as capacity building, IP
>> addressing, and
>> >> Internet governance.  These Opinions were discussed among all
>> participants:
>> >> ITU member states and sector members, civil society organizations, and
>> other
>> >> key international stakeholders. The inclusion of stakeholders assisted
>> in
>> >> broadening the discussion to allow for a more inclusive dialogue.  As a
>> >> result, a vigorous debate related to the role of governments in the
>> >> multi-stakeholder model exhibited the importance of continued
>> discussions in
>> >> a variety of fora.
>> >>
>> >> “This week’s dialogue was a significant step forward,” said Lynn St.
>> Amour,
>> >> Internet Society President and Chief Executive Officer.  “We know that
>> the
>> >> multi-stakeholder model has served the Internet and individuals across
>> the
>> >> world extraordinarily well, leading to innovations and infrastructure
>> >> development that may not have come about with a top-down model. We
>> welcome
>> >> this open dialogue and hope these discussions continue over the coming
>> >> months at forums such as the Commission on Science and Technology for
>> >> Development and the Internet Governance Forum in order that all voices
>> are
>> >> heard.”
>> >>
>> >> The Internet Society is a global, nonprofit organization dedicated to
>> an
>> >> open Internet for everyone. The Internet Society is a strong advocate
>> of the
>> >> multi-stakeholder model of Internet governance because it is the heart
>> of
>> >> the Internet’s architectural foundation and has proven to be the best
>> way to
>> >> ensure that the benefits of the Internet are available to all.
>>  Experience
>> >> shows that public policy processes that draw from a base of community
>> >> expertise are most effective in creating the environment in which
>> Internet
>> >> development and access can flourish.
>> >>
>> >> To read the Internet Society submission to the WTPF, visit:
>> >>
>> http://www.internetsociety.org/doc/contribution-itu-2013-world-telecommunicationict-policy-forum
>> .
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
>> >> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
>> >> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
>> > to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
>> > Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
>> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
>> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Saskia Kiisel
>
> Juhatuse esimees | Chairman of the Board
> MTÜ Eesti Interneti Kogukond | ASBL Estonian Internet Community
> Internet Society Estonia Chapter
> **
> Tel +372 5382 2723
> **E-post *saskia.kiisel at gmail.com
> *Skype saskia.kiisel
> Veeb http://www.kogukond.org*
>
>  _______________________________________________
> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
>
>
>

-- 

*Saskia Kiisel

Juhatuse esimees | Chairman of the Board
MTÜ Eesti Interneti Kogukond | ASBL Estonian Internet Community
Internet Society Estonia Chapter
**
Tel +372 5382 2723
**E-post *saskia.kiisel at gmail.com
*Skype saskia.kiisel
Veeb http://www.kogukond.org*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20130518/ecc0dbba/attachment.htm>