[Chapter-delegates] ISOC position on NSA Spying

[Shreedeep Rayamajhi]

This is a serious issue not just at individual level but it marks its
presence and essence according to the level of information used and
intention that is involved. As the right to privacy not only secures the
right of one's weakness but it also makes the subject vulnerable at
different level of how that information can be and will be used.

Like such this is a more broad perspective of internet dynamics where all
stakeholders need to play part. The role and objective of the surveillance
cannot be justified in any name. Moreover tracking information certainly
has its own justification but the use and intentions cannot be justified.

The role and objective of the internet governance needs to be well adapted
here with the perspective of  standardization or else its just the wrong
use of power by the United states


http://www.rayznews.com/prism-surveillance-program-compromises-privacy-online/


Cheers to Life
Shreedeep Rayamajhi
00977-9841374547(Nepal)
00977-9851049683(Nepal)
00977-9813900099

+1(301)485-9395(US)
<http://www.rayznews.com/>

*DISCLAIMER:* This message is intended only for the recipient. If you are
not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying,
distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this
information is strictly prohibited.


On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Carlos A. Afonso <ca at cafonso.ca> wrote:

> However, there are specific EU-USA treaties and agreements authorizing
> data eavesdropping of Europeans which could be dropped, notwithstanding the
> fact that spying has happened, is happening and will continue to happen.
>
> --c.a.
>
>
> On 06/12/2013 12:50 AM, Elver Loho wrote:
>
>> That comment by Viviane Reding is ridiculous. There is literally no law
>> or directive or whatnot that the EU can pass within its current mandate
>> that would affect the US ability to spy on us. The EU cannot even legislate
>> the spy programs of its own member states: fundamental EU treaties make a
>> specific exception for national security measures.
>>
>> The legal aspect of this was analyzed in a 2001 European Parliament
>> report, starting in chapter 7:
>>
>> http://cryptome.org/echelon-**ep-fin.htm<http://cryptome.org/echelon-ep-fin.htm>
>>
>> Best,
>> Elver
>>
>> elver.loho at gmail.com
>> +372 5661 6933
>> skype: elver.loho
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 12.06.2013, at 0:37, "Carlos A. Afonso" <ca at cafonso.ca> wrote:
>>
>>  Yes, I agree with David. I also expect Europe to strongly move against
>>> these blatant violations. After all, Obama said that is is "only about
>>> foreigners" (!). Europeans are in, of course. This is a BBC report showing
>>> initial moves from the EU, involving Justice Commissioner Viviane Reding:
>>>
>>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/**world-us-canada-22857062<http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-22857062>
>>>
>>> fraternal regards
>>>
>>> --c.a.
>>>
>>> On 06/11/2013 06:03 PM, David Solomonoff wrote:
>>>
>>>> The revelations about the National Security Agency's surveillance
>>>> apparatus, if true, are a stunning abuse of our basic rights to freedom
>>>> and privacy.
>>>>
>>>> A coalition has formed to demand that the U.S. Congress reveal the full
>>>> extent of the NSA's domestic spying programs. I'm personally joining the
>>>> Electronic Frontier Foundation, Mozilla, Free Press, Fight for the
>>>> Future, Access and many more consumer activist groups as part of that
>>>> coalition.
>>>>
>>>> I believe that the Internet Society should sign their petition as well.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.stopwatching.us
>>>>
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
>>> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
>>> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
>>>
>>
>>  ______________________________**_________________
> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20130612/b7636117/attachment.htm>