[Chapter-delegates] Netiquette of Chapter-Delegates list. Was: Input Request: ISOC Comments to WCIT

Veni Markovski veni at veni.com
Thu Oct 25 17:52:15 PDT 2012


Rudi,
On a number of occasions I have heard that ISOC.be is participating in 
the discussion. That means that either you didn't make it clear enough 
it is you, in your personal capacity, participating, or - if you have 
said so - the message didn't get out. Nobody would question whether you 
support or not the CleanIT project - if it was your own choice, and had 
nothing to do with ISOC.be (or ISOC.org by way of you being a BoT member).
So, instead of thinking of a debate, perhaps focusing on the message 
that you are not representing ISOC, ISOC.be, etc. might be better;-)

Best,
Veni


On 10/25/2012 05:32, Rudi Vansnick wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> First I want to know where I explicitly expressed I was supporting CleanIT project ?
>
> Furthermore I would really like to know what kind of harm I'm doing while participating in this project ? Which chapter can send me any information on what they had have as embarrassment so far ?
>
> I'm participating in the discussions to defend the openness of the Internet, NOT to close it down !!!  As we defend in many other cases and debates the openness I'm using the ability to bring forward the principles of good governance we in general apply in so many other dossiers. If I step out of the project I will no longer have the ability to argument against controlling and blocking the Internet just for the purpose of countering terrorism activities. I consider it an opportunity to stress this factor of fear of infringement of each and every ones freedom of expression and spread this message among the participants of this project.
>
> Some thoughts : Don't we allow our providers to block SPAM, PHISHING etc emails ? Don't we use parental software to block content for the purpose of protecting our children from harmful content ?
>
> I want you all to read the attached document from the United Nations "Use of Internet for Terrorist Purposes", especially "D. Rule-of-law considerations".
>
> Always open for a fair debate.
>
> Kind regards,

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20121025/ef45caa6/attachment.htm>


More information about the Chapter-delegates mailing list