[Chapter-delegates] Net Neutrality

[Grigori Saghyan]

Dear Carlos, All,
My impression of ISOC position  is, in general,  following: If  the
operator has different rules  for different protocols - it is not the
Internet access, it is something other. Operator can use any
limitations, but in that case operator do not have any  rights to say,
that he is an Internet service provider and MUST declare, what kind of
limitations for different protocols he has.



On 5/30/2012 6:30 PM, cveraq at gmail.com wrote:
> Internet Society as organization can and must have a voice. An official position. It must have an official channel and also an official section (editorial, official letter, etc) to express that vision or position. In this way no one should ask if this is or not an official position.
> 
> Carlos Vera
> Isoc Ecuador
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Burger <eburger at standardstrack.com>
> Sender: chapter-delegates-bounces at elists.isoc.org
> Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 07:06:09 
> To: Elena Zvarici<elena.zvarici at isoc.ro>
> Cc: chapter-delegates<chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org>
> Subject: Re: [Chapter-delegates] Net Neutrality
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Chapter-delegates mailing list
> Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Chapter-delegates mailing list
> Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates
> 


-- 
Grigori Saghyan
PGP Key ID: 0x48E4D5DC

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 552 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20120530/30318a58/attachment.asc>