[Chapter-delegates] Statement on Open Internet proposal from Google and Verizon

[Nicolas Antoniello]

Dear all,

Just to specify the way we will use "neutral", when you say "neutral to all
trafic" you really mean "equal" or "without any intervention on traffic
flow" or other meaning ?

Regards,
Nicolas
ISOC Uruguay


On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:34, Eduardo Diaz <eduardodiazrivera at gmail.com>wrote:

> I agree with ISOC position. Networks should be neutral to all traffic.
> There should be an amble debate on this. The fact that the Open Internet
> Proposal is being generated by two humongous, for PROFIT, big companies like
> Google and Verizon is already a concern. How do we start this debate?
>
> Eduardo Diaz
> ISOC-PR
>
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Anya Chambers <chambers at isoc.org> wrote:
>
>> Dear all
>>
>> Please find for your reference/ use the Internet Society's position on the
>> Google/ Verizon developments.
>>
>> The Internet Society notes with interest the recent Open Internet proposal
>> from Google and Verizon. We believe it would be constructive for this
>> proposal from two United States-based companies to be debated and considered
>> by the global Internet community in an open and transparent process so that
>> a range of perspectives may be brought to bear on this difficult topic.  In
>> the end, this has the potential for deep global impact, and policy makers
>> around the world need to consider the outcome of those discussions, taking
>> care to develop policies that promote innovation and growth
>> without unintentionally stifling it.
>>
>> The Internet Society is committed to supporting Internet policies that
>> promote competition, allow users to access lawful content and applications,
>> and enhance transparency for users. Fundamentally, we believe that Internet
>> access should mean the provision of connectivity to the global Internet
>> without any regard to the source, destination or content of subscriber
>> traffic.  Other offerings may provide IP-based applications and services to
>> consumers on a more limited basis but do not truly constitute “Internet
>> access”.  Measures to improve transparency in Internet access offerings are
>> critical so that consumers can make informed choices on the basis of clear
>> and comparable information.
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Anya
>>
>> Anya Chambers
>> *Internet Society*
>>
>> mobile: +1 224 321 0378
>> web: www.InternetSociety.org
>> twitter: mobile: InternetSociety
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chapter-delegates mailing list
>> Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
>> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only
> for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If
> you have received this communication by error, please notify us immediately
> by e-mail, and delete the original message.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chapter-delegates mailing list
> Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20100812/d900a65d/attachment.htm>