[Chapter-delegates] Chapter Advisory Council

[Hakikur Rahman]

Furthermore, interactions at regional levels 
would be more efficient and effective, provided 
they are guided by prescribed mandates. Bottom-up 
approach always gives you better result. Again, 
it should follow particular ToR. It is good sign 
that in other parts ISOC has created regional 
outlets. Consequently, leadership at regional level also counts.

Thanks.
Hakik.

At 12:54 AM 10/19/2006, Khaled KOUBAA wrote:
>Erkiki, Veni,
>
>It is not bureaucracy but it is the only way to imply chapters
>representatives to work together and help information to go up to
>decision makers.
>Until know we had seen emails from some persons to accelerate changing,
>and things go slowly. Many other chapters don’t participate to this
>newsletter and their voice is not heared ( problem of time, language, 

>). I remember chapters meeting in Marrakech, it was very beneficial the
>face-to-face contact between David, board members and chapters.
>Meetings between person from the same region and speaking almost the
>same language needs more bureaucracy and money but is more efficient.
>
>Regards.
>
> > Effective? Certainly more bureaucratic than efficient.
> >
> > Erkki I. Kolehmainen
> > Tilkankatu 12 A 3, FI-00300 Helsinki, Finland
> > Puh. (09) 4368 2643, 0400 825 943; Tel. +358 
> 9 4368 2643, +358 400 825 943
> >
> >
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Chapter-delegates mailing list
>Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
>http://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates
>
>--
>This message has been scanned for viruses and
>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>believed to be clean.



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.