[chapter-delegates] [Fwd: [pignet] FW: CTO SURVEY SEES DIFFICULTIES FOR CONSENSUS ON INTERNET GOVERNANCE]

[Rosa Delgado]

Thanks for this report but we should not be surprise as CTO is
governamental organization and I see CTO is mobilizing countries were
not in the discussion before
 
Regs/Rosa
 
 -----Original Message-----
From: Franck Martin [mailto:franck at sopac.org] 
Sent: Monday, 22 November 2004 01:20
To: chapter-delegates at lists.isoc.org
Subject: [chapter-delegates] [Fwd: [pignet] FW: CTO SURVEY SEES
DIFFICULTIES FOR CONSENSUS ON INTERNET GOVERNANCE]

FYI

-------- Original Message -------- 
Subject: 	[pignet] FW: CTO SURVEY SEES DIFFICULTIES FOR CONSENSUS
ON INTERNET GOVERNANCE	
Date: 	Sat, 20 Nov 2004 09:36:26 +1200	
From: 	Abel Caine  <mailto:acaine at itc.gov.fj> <acaine at itc.gov.fj>	
Reply-To: 	Pacific Internet Users Group Mailing List
<mailto:pignet at lyris.spc.int> <pignet at lyris.spc.int>	
To: 	Pacific Internet Users Group Mailing List
<mailto:pignet at lyris.spc.int> <pignet at lyris.spc.int>	

To all,

CTO's survey is not comprehensive but the views expressed would delight
ITU and horrify ICANN. The IG debate/debacle is going to be the best ICT
fight in 2005.

Cheers,
Abel 

-----Original Message-----
From: CTO News [mailto:newsletter at cto.int] 
Sent: Saturday, 20 November 2004 12:21 a.m.
To: CTO News Subscriber
Subject: CTO SURVEY SEES DIFFICULTIES FOR CONSENSUS ON INTERNET
GOVERNANCE

CTO SURVEY SEES DIFFICULTIES FOR CONSENSUS ON INTERNET GOVERNANCE

London, 18 November 2004 - A preliminary survey by the Commonwealth
Telecommunications Organisation (CTO) warns of potential difficulties
within the international community in reaching consensus over the
governance of the Internet, one of the two fundamental issues, together
with the funding of the efforts to bridge the Digital Divide, that the
second phase of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS II) is
expected to address.

As the Internet continues to grow as a cultural, economic, and political
phenomenon, increasing attention is being paid to how it should be
governed. The debate over this is what led the 11,000 delegates at the
WSIS I in Geneva in December 2003, to agree that the matter be referred
to the UN Secretary General for further study. Although the Secretary
General has set up a Working Group on Internet Governance, a variety of
interest groups are undertaking their own internal consultations, with a
view to contributing composite views where possible to the WGIG, for
onward discussion at the next WSIS in Tunis in November 2005. This
survey by the CTO of its member countries and institutions represents an
attempt to collate the views of Commonwealth ICT stakeholders in order
to contribute. 

The CTO, as an intergovernmental agency representing the interests of
governments, regulators, telephone companies and other ICT stakeholders
mostly based in Commonwealth countries is centrally concerned about the
impact of the Internet, its possibilities for making major contributions
to developing knowledge societies and economies, and the challenges and
risks associated with certain aspects of this important means of
communication. Cognisant of the role information and communication can
play in reducing poverty and promoting growth, and especially in
enabling developing countries to achieve their targets set in the
Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), the CTO considers it as part of its
responsibility to create, amongst its core constituencies, awareness and
understanding of the issues involved in Internet Governance. 

Deeper understanding of the critical dimensions of Internet Governance,
the CTO believes, would enable delegations from countries that will be
represented at WSIS II in Tunis to speak from a common framework of
understanding, and hopefully lead to a more harmonious outcome of
deliberations and agreements. As a true multi-stakeholder partnership
with representation from the varied sectors of the ICT sector and with
membership from all major geographic regions of the World, the CTO is
increasingly becoming recognised as a honest broker. Its efforts to
provide hard facts about the opinions of decision-makers in its member
countries should facilitate a deeper appreciation of the areas of
convergence and the areas of divergence amongst countries and types of
entities, thereby providing early warning signals about likely flash
points in the debate. It is hoped that the interim findings of this
preliminary survey will already demonstrate the need for considerable
knowledge sharing and public education long before November 2005, if the
global gathering in Tunis is to succeed. 

This interim survey has been conducted purely as a preliminary effort to
begin mapping of opinions, attitudes and positions on some of the
contentious aspects of Internet Governance. It was conducted entirely
with the CTO's own resources and therefore does not pander to any
special interest. 

The survey was conducted based on a formal questionnaire that posed some
25 questions to government ministers, other public servants from
ministries, regulators, telephone company executives, and other ICT
practitioners who had gathered in  Colombo, Sri Lanka, in September
2004,  for the annual CTO Forum that precedes the Organisation's Annual
Council meeting. Responses were obtained from delegates from some 30
countries, mostly from the developing regions of Africa, Caribbean and
the Asia-Pacific regions. 

As results coming out of surveys of small sample size can possibly be
skewed, it is the intention of the CTO to conduct further surveys on
larger samples to minimise distortions in reaching conclusions. If the
results show clear consensus on aspects such as the need for a clear and
broad definition of Internet Governance, they also reveal disparities of
opinion and potential disagreement and on other aspects, as the summary
below shows. 

General governance issues 

1. Asked how broad a definition of Internet Governance they wished
to see, most participants (78%) stated the need for a broad definition
of internet governance, to include such issues as spam, Internet pricing
and interconnection, rather than a narrower definition that would limit
the discussion to such matters as IP addresses and root server
administration. 

2. Asked what kind of organisation respondents felt should govern
the Internet, 41.4% said they preferred an inter-governmental
organisation while 27% were happy for things to remain as they are. 

3. To the question regarding how Internet Governance decisions
should be made, 37% of respondents wanted the WSIS to be the main focal
point for decisions, 29% asked for a new inter-governmental
organisation, 25.9% were happy with the status quo and 3.4% thought
ICANN should be in charge. 

4. Asked about the role of ICANN, 47.8% of respondents felt that
ICANN is only one of several important actors in the Internet Governance
system, with 21.7% stating that ICANN dominates the system, and 4.3%
reporting that ICANN's role is minimal.   

5. Asked about any changes they may wish in ICANN's role, the
majority of open-ended comments suggested that ICANN should have more
representation for developing countries, and listen to their concerns,
especially on matters such as bandwidth pricing. 

6. On linguistic accessibility, 44.8% of respondents expressed
satisfaction with the current English-dominated system for e-mail
addressing and web-page addressing, while 27.6% supported
multilingualism and internationalisation of the Internet-perhaps
reflecting the bias of a Commonwealth English-speaking audience group. 
   
Policy/technology issues - Spam and cyber crime

7.  While respondents were informed by the questionnaire that 90% of
all spam originated from OECD countries of which the USA alone accounted
for 57%, some 38% of respondents stated that nation states are not
responsible for spam originating from their countries, and that it is
better to find the actual perpetrators of spam and to punish them. 27%
felt that the solution to eliminating cyber crime is technological,
requiring users to acquire the necessary software to eliminate it. 

8. In an open-ended question about which form of cyber crime is
most prevalent in their respective countries, most respondents thought
it is illegal access while most respondent also stated that the most
serious cyber crime is the financial fraud. 

Revenue sharing issues

9. On revenue dimensions of the Internet, 60% of respondents agreed
on the need for international agreements to govern taxation and
e-commerce, while 35.7% disagreed with the need for any such agreements.


Control of Root Server 

10. While 20.7% of respondents were satisfied with the current
system of root server administration, 72% felt that an organisation
under the UN umbrella should be responsible for control of root servers.

11. On ccTLDs management, 51.7% favoured a single private sector
multi-stakeholder entity, endorsed by Governments to manage ccTLDs,
while 27.6% felt a Government agency in each country should manage
ccTLDs and domain space.
  
Impact of Internet Governance

12. Regarding how important a consensus on Internet Governance
issues is to enable countries to achieve their Millennium Development
Goals, 53.8% of respondents thought this was very important, while only
7.7% thought it was not important. 

13. Nevertheless, 81.5% of respondents said good Internet Governance
cannot directly create gender equality or end poverty, but will enable
ICTs to be an effective tool for social action and positive social
change, while some 11.1% thought it would help create gender equality
and end poverty.

Participation of developing countries in ICT decision-making

14. Asked in a ranked order what factor seemed most to withhold
developing countries from active participation in international ICT
decision-making, the factor selected by the highest group of respondents
was 'lack of technical and policy capacity on ICT issues', followed by
lack of financial resources to travel to events involving ICT
decision-making. 

UN ICT consultation processes

15. Some cumulative 80% of respondents either strongly agreed or
agreed that it is an excellent idea for the UN Secretary General to have
constituted the UN Working Group on Internet Governance (WGIG), while
7.7% strongly disagreed. 

16. On the online forum initiated by UN ICT Task Force, respondents
indicated that around 63% had no prior experience with the online forum
and felt that the forum could be more useful through regional discussion
groups, seminars and workshops conducted by the CTO with better
publicity to increase participation by LDCs.

Confidence in UN WGIG

17. While 37.5% of respondents are confident and 45.8% mildly
confident that their views will be recognised by the UN WGIG, over 66%
are not optimistic or only mildly so, that the UN WGIG would be able to
achieve consensus amongst its members and produce a workable definition
of Internet Governance by the time WSIS Tunis 2005 begins, with only
8.3% feeling very optimistic that consensus would be reached.

***

For more information, please visit www.cto.int or contact Marcel
Belingue at m.belingue at cto.int or telephone: +44 20 7839 5174.

About the CTO - The Commonwealth Telecommunications Organisation (CTO)
is an international development partnership between Commonwealth and
non-Commonwealth governments, businesses and civil society organisations
focused on information and communication technologies (ICT) and
development. The CTO supports the international community's efforts to
bridge the digital divide and promote social and economic development,
by delivering to developing countries unique knowledge-sharing
programmes in the use of ICTs in the specific areas of
telecommunications, IT, broadcasting and the Internet. Recently, the CTO
has significantly reviewed its mandate to reflect and respond more fully
to today's global development challenge as set in the United Nations
Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Today, our mission is to offer the
highest quality programmes for capacity development, knowledge-sharing
and information services, expand and diversify partnerships between
governments, businesses and other organisations to reduce global poverty
and fulfil the global development agenda for ICT in the key sectors of
food and agriculture, education, health, e-government and e-commerce.
The CTO also facilitates the successful development of
telecommunications and other businesses to support social and economic
development objectives of governments and civil society.

Important: 
If you would like to be removed from our electronic news releases list,
send a blank email to newsletter at cto.int with subject "Unsubscribe".



*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=* 
To unsubscribe send a blank email to : 
unsubscribe-pignet at lyris.spc.int 
*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*
To be on this list you must be an ISOC member:
Register at www.isoc.org it is free.
Select the Pacific Islands Chapter.



-- 

Franck Martin

ICT Specialist

franck at sopac.org

SOPAC, Fiji

GPG Key fingerprint = 44A4 8AE4 392A 3B92 FDF9  D9C6 BE79 9E60 81D9 1320

"Toute connaissance est une reponse a une question" G.Bachelard

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20050401/60a0e879/attachment.htm>