[MemberPubPol] [chapter-delegates] Re: ISOC and WGIG report

[borka at e5.ijs.si]

Dear all,

I support both proposal. 
The question that appear now is: who will
prepare the ISOC_ECC statement (any
volonteer(s) ?)  and if we need
to agree on the content on the   ISOC-ECC list?


With regards,

Borka


> 
> Veni Markovski wrote:
> > At 10:56 29-06-05  +0200, Erik Huizer wrote:
> > 
> >>We might run the risk of finding out that all the polled parties are 
> >>nearly in agreement. That would be shocking.
> >>
> >>seriously, I think this is a really good idea.
> > 
> > 
> > So do I. Question now is that because of timing - report comes out 
> > mid July, and August more or less no one works in Europe:) - what 
> > kind of process shall we have to prepare statement, to distribute, to 
> > discuss, to publish?
> 
> Use the memberubpol/chapter-delegates mailing list?
> 
> > Also, shall we have an additional ISOC-ECC statement?
> > I also strongly encourage every chapter to make their own, too.
> 
> Agree on both points.
> Time-wise, it may be easier to co-ordinate and have an ISOC-ECC 
> statement. However it would be advantageous to have both, individual 
> chapter statement as well as the ISOC-ECC one. Alternatively, we can 
> have additional individual chapters sign up for the ISOC-ECC one, if agree.
> 
> 
> Desiree Miloshevic
> --
> 
> 
> 
>