FW: [chapter-delegates] Re: Report of the 2005 ISOC Nominations

[Veni Markovski]

Ramon and all,

when I suggested to stay quiet on the list, I meant several things:

1. We have said whatever we wanted.
2. I need some time to think over if it's worth running under petition.

There's time until April 30th, so we could do it. But right now, I am 
occupied with the ICANN meeting, then have some work in the US, then go 
back in Sofia. I will be more free to talk after April 20th, and we can 
continue.

In the meantime, thanks for the tens of messages in support I am getting in 
my inbox - they just confirm my understanding of the work I've done within 
ISOC, and show me I could have done even much more.

Whatever my decision is, I will write down a full report of what I did, how 
I achieved it, who in the Board was opposing it, and why. It's going to be 
an interesting reading, I can promise you. And it may be useful for the 
next board, and esp. the next leadership of ISOC, if they want not to 
repeat the past mistakes.

Again, please, let's have some time for other work, and let's focus on the 
elections in private e-mails, phone calls, IM, etc.

Sincerely,
Veni

At 05:35 05-04-05  -0400, Ramon Morales wrote:


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ramon Morales [mailto:ramon at isocpr.org]
>Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 4:56 AM
>To: 'Margaret Wasserman'
>Subject: RE: [chapter-delegates] Re: Report of the 2005 ISOC Nominations
>
>Margaret,
>Do you really believe that not allowing an incumbent to run again and to