[Ndss-tot-award] Voting results

David Balenson david.balenson at sri.com
Wed Jan 23 07:33:16 PST 2019


Hi all,

 

My initial thought was 2 awards but I’m also fine with 3 awards if that makes sense. I would not do more than 3 this year.

 

Thanks,

-DB

 

 

From: Ndss-tot-award <ndss-tot-award-bounces at elists.isoc.org> on behalf of Paul Syverson <paul.syverson at nrl.navy.mil>
Reply-To: NDSS Test of Time Award <ndss-tot-award at elists.isoc.org>
Date: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 at 10:27 AM
To: NDSS Test of Time Award <ndss-tot-award at elists.isoc.org>
Subject: Re: [Ndss-tot-award] Voting results

 

D'accord.

-Paul

 

On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 03:02:43PM +0000, Jaeger, Trent Ray wrote:

I was planning to do (2).  Have to be a quick secondary vote, as we need to get plaques going.

I am inclined towards 3 for the first year.

Regards,

Trent.

----------------------------------------------

Trent Jaeger

Professor, CSE Department

Pennsylvania State University

W359 Westgate Bldg, University Park, PA 16802

Email: tjaeger at cse.psu.edu<mailto:tjaeger at cse.psu.edu>

Ph: (814) 865-1042, Fax: (814) 865-3176

URL: http://www.trentjaeger.com

On Jan 23, 2019, at 9:58 AM, Paul Syverson <paul.syverson at nrl.navy.mil<mailto:paul.syverson at nrl.navy.mil>> wrote:

This sounds fine. I didn't realize that we had settled on picking from

a range of 10 _or more_ years ago in general, not just for this inaugural

selection. I would still go for 3 rather than 2 for the inaugural group.

How do you want to do selection? Likely choices are

(1) runoff between these 6, picking the top 3 (or 2 if disagree w/ above)

(2) just pick the top 3 from this election, and we're done

(3) shoot for consensus

(2) is simplest, but I'm inclined towards (1). Of course, somebody

could suggest still another approach.

aloha,

Paul

On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 02:38:49PM +0000, Jaeger, Trent Ray wrote:

I would advocate allowing papers from more than ten years before the current conference remain eligible for ToT Award.

Collecting six papers now seems like overkill.  I think 2-3 per year for the next few years at least seems more appropriate, while given the others a second chance.

BTW - USENIX Security chooses ToT Award papers that may be more than 10 years old - however, they typically only do one per year.  I like doing 2-3.

Regards,

Trent.

----------------------------------------------

Trent Jaeger

Professor, CSE Department

Pennsylvania State University

W359 Westgate Bldg, University Park, PA 16802

Email: tjaeger at cse.psu.edu<mailto:tjaeger at cse.psu.edu><mailto:tjaeger at cse.psu.edu>

Ph: (814) 865-1042, Fax: (814) 865-3176

URL: https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.trentjaeger.com&data=02%7C01%7Ctrj1%40psu.edu%7Ca023e89e2d154fbba5c108d681433ce5%7C7cf48d453ddb4389a9c1c115526eb52e%7C0%7C0%7C636838523132274565&sdata=JdBNzr4HTjK1YGMwAmlo4wm43JM1pDhq1WLnE4oY3SA%3D&reserved=0

On Jan 23, 2019, at 9:34 AM, Paul Syverson <paul.syverson at nrl.navy.mil<mailto:paul.syverson at nrl.navy.mil><mailto:paul.syverson at nrl.navy.mil>> wrote:

Hi Trent et al.,

If I recall discussion about this initial reward, it was about picking

ToT papers for the range 1995-2009, with an assumption that in

subsequent years the ToT committee would be picking 0-2 papers from

the proceedings of the year ten years prior to the current year

(e.g. in 2020 select from 2010 proceedings). The default expectation

is to pick 1 each year, though with flexibility.

We had discussed picking 1-2 papers for each year 1995-2009. I could

see that would perhaps be excessive. But narrowing to just 2-3 papers

for the entire 14 years seems extreme the other way.

As it is we have (in the order of vote results below) papers from

1996, 2003, 1999, 2000, 2002, 2004.

That seems like an OK spread for this period. Why not select all of them?

Better still, we should consider this as covering the first decade

1995-2005---six test of time papers for a decade seems reasonable to me.

Then the committee next year can do 2005-2010, then

start with just the precise tenth previous year in 2021.

That can be a separate consideration, but whether we consider

the range to be 1995-2009 or 1995-2009, I would strongly prefer

to pick all six of the papers with 5 or more points.

aloha,

Paul

On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 02:09:14PM +0000, Jaeger, Trent Ray wrote:

Hi,

Here are the results of the voting for the first ToT award.

23pts: SKEME: A Versatile Secure Key Exchange Mechanism for Internet

13pts: A Virtual Machine Introspection Based Architecture for Intrusion Detection

9pts: Client Puzzles: A Cryptographic Countermeasure Against Connection Depletion Attacks

6pts: A First Step Towards Automated Detection of Buffer Overrun Vulnerabilities

5pts: Implementing Pushback: Router-Based Defense Against DDoS Attacks

5pts: The Design and Implementation of Datagram TLS

Others less than 5pts.

Shall we pick the top two or three?

Regards,

Trent.

----------------------------------------------

Trent Jaeger

Professor, CSE Department

Pennsylvania State University

W359 Westgate Bldg, University Park, PA 16802

Email: tjaeger at cse.psu.edu<mailto:tjaeger at cse.psu.edu><mailto:tjaeger at cse.psu.edu><mailto:tjaeger at cse.psu.edu>

Ph: (814) 865-1042, Fax: (814) 865-3176

URL: https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.trentjaeger.com&data=02%7C01%7Ctrj1%40psu.edu%7Ca023e89e2d154fbba5c108d681433ce5%7C7cf48d453ddb4389a9c1c115526eb52e%7C0%7C0%7C636838523132274565&sdata=JdBNzr4HTjK1YGMwAmlo4wm43JM1pDhq1WLnE4oY3SA%3D&reserved=0

--

Ndss-tot-award mailing list

Ndss-tot-award at elists.isoc.org<mailto:Ndss-tot-award at elists.isoc.org><mailto:Ndss-tot-award at elists.isoc.org>

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Felists.isoc.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fndss-tot-award&data=02%7C01%7Ctrj1%40psu.edu%7Ca023e89e2d154fbba5c108d681433ce5%7C7cf48d453ddb4389a9c1c115526eb52e%7C0%7C0%7C636838523132274565&sdata=Q3E39HT82YnGnS91A30Z1LIFuVRXr%2Bvyp2zdtQf41FE%3D&reserved=0

--

Ndss-tot-award mailing list

Ndss-tot-award at elists.isoc.org<mailto:Ndss-tot-award at elists.isoc.org>

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Felists.isoc.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fndss-tot-award&data=02%7C01%7Ctrj1%40psu.edu%7Ca023e89e2d154fbba5c108d681433ce5%7C7cf48d453ddb4389a9c1c115526eb52e%7C0%7C0%7C636838523132274565&sdata=Q3E39HT82YnGnS91A30Z1LIFuVRXr%2Bvyp2zdtQf41FE%3D&reserved=0

--

Ndss-tot-award mailing list

Ndss-tot-award at elists.isoc.org<mailto:Ndss-tot-award at elists.isoc.org>

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Felists.isoc.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fndss-tot-award&data=02%7C01%7Ctrj1%40psu.edu%7Ca023e89e2d154fbba5c108d681433ce5%7C7cf48d453ddb4389a9c1c115526eb52e%7C0%7C0%7C636838523132274565&sdata=Q3E39HT82YnGnS91A30Z1LIFuVRXr%2Bvyp2zdtQf41FE%3D&reserved=0

--

Ndss-tot-award mailing list

Ndss-tot-award at elists.isoc.org<mailto:Ndss-tot-award at elists.isoc.org>

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Felists.isoc.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fndss-tot-award&data=02%7C01%7Ctrj1%40psu.edu%7Ca023e89e2d154fbba5c108d681433ce5%7C7cf48d453ddb4389a9c1c115526eb52e%7C0%7C0%7C636838523132274565&sdata=Q3E39HT82YnGnS91A30Z1LIFuVRXr%2Bvyp2zdtQf41FE%3D&reserved=0

 

-- 

Ndss-tot-award mailing list

Ndss-tot-award at elists.isoc.org

https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ndss-tot-award

 

-- 

Ndss-tot-award mailing list

Ndss-tot-award at elists.isoc.org

https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ndss-tot-award

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://elists.isoc.org/pipermail/ndss-tot-award/attachments/20190123/c0aab33c/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4586 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://elists.isoc.org/pipermail/ndss-tot-award/attachments/20190123/c0aab33c/attachment-0001.p7s>


More information about the Ndss-tot-award mailing list