[Ndss-tot-award] Voting results

Paul Syverson paul.syverson at nrl.navy.mil
Wed Jan 23 06:58:01 PST 2019


This sounds fine. I didn't realize that we had settled on picking from
a range of 10 _or more_ years ago in general, not just for this inaugural
selection. I would still go for 3 rather than 2 for the inaugural group.

How do you want to do selection? Likely choices are
(1) runoff between these 6, picking the top 3 (or 2 if disagree w/ above)
(2) just pick the top 3 from this election, and we're done
(3) shoot for consensus

(2) is simplest, but I'm inclined towards (1). Of course, somebody
could suggest still another approach.

aloha,
Paul

On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 02:38:49PM +0000, Jaeger, Trent Ray wrote:
> I would advocate allowing papers from more than ten years before the current conference remain eligible for ToT Award.
> 
> Collecting six papers now seems like overkill.  I think 2-3 per year for the next few years at least seems more appropriate, while given the others a second chance.
> 
> BTW - USENIX Security chooses ToT Award papers that may be more than 10 years old - however, they typically only do one per year.  I like doing 2-3.
> 
> Regards,
> Trent.
> ----------------------------------------------
> Trent Jaeger
> Professor, CSE Department
> Pennsylvania State University
> W359 Westgate Bldg, University Park, PA 16802
> Email: tjaeger at cse.psu.edu<mailto:tjaeger at cse.psu.edu>
> Ph: (814) 865-1042, Fax: (814) 865-3176
> URL: http://www.trentjaeger.com
> 
> On Jan 23, 2019, at 9:34 AM, Paul Syverson <paul.syverson at nrl.navy.mil<mailto:paul.syverson at nrl.navy.mil>> wrote:
> 
> Hi Trent et al.,
> 
> If I recall discussion about this initial reward, it was about picking
> ToT papers for the range 1995-2009, with an assumption that in
> subsequent years the ToT committee would be picking 0-2 papers from
> the proceedings of the year ten years prior to the current year
> (e.g. in 2020 select from 2010 proceedings). The default expectation
> is to pick 1 each year, though with flexibility.
> 
> We had discussed picking 1-2 papers for each year 1995-2009. I could
> see that would perhaps be excessive. But narrowing to just 2-3 papers
> for the entire 14 years seems extreme the other way.
> As it is we have (in the order of vote results below) papers from
> 1996, 2003, 1999, 2000, 2002, 2004.
> That seems like an OK spread for this period. Why not select all of them?
> 
> Better still, we should consider this as covering the first decade
> 1995-2005---six test of time papers for a decade seems reasonable to me.
> Then the committee next year can do 2005-2010, then
> start with just the precise tenth previous year in 2021.
> That can be a separate consideration, but whether we consider
> the range to be 1995-2009 or 1995-2009, I would strongly prefer
> to pick all six of the papers with 5 or more points.
> 
> aloha,
> Paul
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 02:09:14PM +0000, Jaeger, Trent Ray wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Here are the results of the voting for the first ToT award.
> 
> 23pts: SKEME: A Versatile Secure Key Exchange Mechanism for Internet
> 13pts: A Virtual Machine Introspection Based Architecture for Intrusion Detection
> 9pts: Client Puzzles: A Cryptographic Countermeasure Against Connection Depletion Attacks
> 6pts: A First Step Towards Automated Detection of Buffer Overrun Vulnerabilities
> 5pts: Implementing Pushback: Router-Based Defense Against DDoS Attacks
> 5pts: The Design and Implementation of Datagram TLS
> 
> Others less than 5pts.
> 
> Shall we pick the top two or three?
> 
> Regards,
> Trent.
> ----------------------------------------------
> Trent Jaeger
> Professor, CSE Department
> Pennsylvania State University
> W359 Westgate Bldg, University Park, PA 16802
> Email: tjaeger at cse.psu.edu<mailto:tjaeger at cse.psu.edu><mailto:tjaeger at cse.psu.edu>
> Ph: (814) 865-1042, Fax: (814) 865-3176
> URL: https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.trentjaeger.com&data=02%7C01%7Ctrj1%40psu.edu%7Cde31cb1b005e403829fc08d6813ff2c2%7C7cf48d453ddb4389a9c1c115526eb52e%7C0%7C0%7C636838508991666854&sdata=hZVZ3aVirLEtULNf97Eo5UX2%2BjO3F8cDQmIDD%2BubLyo%3D&reserved=0
> 
> 
> --
> Ndss-tot-award mailing list
> Ndss-tot-award at elists.isoc.org<mailto:Ndss-tot-award at elists.isoc.org>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Felists.isoc.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fndss-tot-award&data=02%7C01%7Ctrj1%40psu.edu%7Cde31cb1b005e403829fc08d6813ff2c2%7C7cf48d453ddb4389a9c1c115526eb52e%7C0%7C0%7C636838508991666854&sdata=dc3vfI9oiQi80zFB3ePVUCEryj1QMRgHEmCRBO8YX%2FU%3D&reserved=0
> 
> --
> Ndss-tot-award mailing list
> Ndss-tot-award at elists.isoc.org<mailto:Ndss-tot-award at elists.isoc.org>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Felists.isoc.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fndss-tot-award&data=02%7C01%7Ctrj1%40psu.edu%7Cde31cb1b005e403829fc08d6813ff2c2%7C7cf48d453ddb4389a9c1c115526eb52e%7C0%7C0%7C636838508991666854&sdata=dc3vfI9oiQi80zFB3ePVUCEryj1QMRgHEmCRBO8YX%2FU%3D&reserved=0
> 

> -- 
> Ndss-tot-award mailing list
> Ndss-tot-award at elists.isoc.org
> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ndss-tot-award



More information about the Ndss-tot-award mailing list