[Chapter-delegates] Internet Society Foundation meeting F34
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond
ocl at gih.com
Wed Nov 19 06:16:22 PST 2025
Dear Ted,
thank you for your response and explanation. This makes sense - thus why
are the minutes and/or resolutions written in such a way, or with
explanatory text that explains both the context and resolution itself?
I still think that we have a problem having resolutions that refer to
"as presented" in closed meetings and to exhibits that are not
published. Such resolutions do not make up much of a track record, do
they? Could it be considered to have the "exhibits" published where non
confidential and even with relevant redaction?
To give you a little heads up, I refer you to the ICANN Redaction Policy
Guidelines which I hope your Board Governance Committee will study.
https://www.icann.org/en/board-activities-and-meetings/briefing-materials-guidelines
Many other organisations have similar guidelines and I invite the ISOC
BoT to launch such a study. The current level of transparency is, in my
humble opinion, still not what we should, as a community, expect from an
organisation that promotes openness.
Kindest regards,
Olivier
On 17/11/2025 20:57, Ted Hardie wrote:
> Hi Olivier,
>
> The policy that was changed named the Foundation's executive director
> as the individual with signature authority over Foundation contracts
> up to a certain level. With the recent restructuring, the equivalent
> position is the VP of Philanthropy, and the update simply changed the
> language in the policy to match the new structure and title.
>
> regards,
>
> Ted
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 5:36 PM Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond
> <ocl at gih.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Ted,
>
> I have followed with interest the recent Internet Society and
> Internet Society Foundation Board meetings. I had a question
> relating to a couple of Internet Society Foundation Resolutions.
> https://www.isocfoundation.org/meeting-agenda/f34-agenda/
>
> Quoting the resolutions:
>
> *9. Approval of Various Foundation Governing Documents – Sally*
> *Wentworth*
>
> *a. Extraordinary Grant Investment Request Policy*
>
> Resolution F2025-X: Approve Amendments to the Extraordinary Grant
> Investment Request Policy
>
> /WHEREAS, via Resolution F2021-16, the Internet Society Foundation
> Board of Trustees adopted an Extraordinary Grant Investment
> Request Policy outlining and authorizing specific actions the
> Executive Director could take;/
>
> /WHEREAS, due to the recent restructuring of the Executive
> Director role, policy details have been updated;/
>
> /RESOLVED, that the Internet Society Foundation Board of Trustees
> hereby adopts the amendments to the Extraordinary Grant Investment
> Request Policy as presented./
>
> *b. Signature Authority and Delegation of Authority Policy*
>
> Resolution F2025-X: Approve Amendments to the Signature Authority
> and Delegation of Authority Policy
>
> /WHEREAS, via Resolution F2022-17, the Internet Society Foundation
> Board of Trustees adopted a Signature Authority and Delegation of
> Authority Policy outlining and authorizing specific actions the
> Executive Director could take;/
>
> /WHEREAS, due to the recent restructuring of the Executive
> Director role, policy details have been updated;/
>
> /RESOLVED, that the Internet Society Foundation Board of Trustees
> hereby adopts the amendments to the Signature Authority and
> Delegation of Authority Policy as presented./
>
> --- End Quote ---
>
> I looked back at F2021-16 and F2022-17:
> ( https://www.isocfoundation.org/board-of-trustees/resolutions/ )
>
> Quoting:
>
> /*Resolution F2021-16: Adopt Extraordinary Grant/Investment
> Request Policy*/
>
> /WHEREAS the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) and the Executive
> Director of the ISOC Foundation occasionally receive grant or
> investment funding requests outside of the approved budget and the
> ordinary grant request process,/
>
> /RESOLVED, that the Board hereby adopts the Extraordinary
> Grant/Investment Request Policy for the ISOC Foundation, attached
> hereto as exhibit A./
>
> /*Resolution F2022-17: Adopt Signature Authorization and
> Delegation of Authority Policy*/
>
> /WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has general authority under
> applicable statutes and the Internet Society Foundation by-laws to
> enter into all contracts to which the Internet Society Foundation
> may be a party, and may delegate such authority to one or more
> Authorized Signatories for the day-to-day management of the
> Internet Society Foundation; and/
>
> /WHEREAS, a policy regarding signature authorization and
> delegation of authority will promote the efficient operation of
> the Internet Society Foundation and establish sound internal
> controls where only individuals with properly delegated signature
> authority are able to commit the Internet Society Foundation to
> binding obligations and execute contracts on behalf of the
> Internet Society Foundation;/
>
> /RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees hereby adopts the Signature
> Authorization and Delegation of Authority Policy as presented./
>
> --- End Quote ---
>
> Unfortunately "Exhibit A" is not comprised in the Minutes, and by
> the way, neither are any "Exhibits" attached to any Resolution,
> thus are the Resolutions, in your view, complete when the majority
> of them are referring to Exhibits that are not made public?
>
> And then "as presented" is also not made available publicly.
>
> So what are the changes that were voted by the Board in regards to
> the "Extraordinary Grant/Investment Request Policy" and the
> "Signature Authority and Delegation of Authority Policy"?
>
> Kindest regards,
>
> Olivier Crépin-Leblond
>
>
>
>
--
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://elists.isoc.org/pipermail/chapter-delegates/attachments/20251119/6bef097f/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Chapter-delegates
mailing list