No subject

But then I don't have the background of Alejandro to see why he feels there has been a complete breakdown. Nor, to my knowledge, has the Chapter leadership more broadly been involved in discussing improvements or problems over the years. 

Example of an area a Chapter Advisory Council could assist with. 

John

John More
Washington DC Chapter
Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 28, 2014, at 7:39 AM, Christian de Larrinaga <cdel at firsthand.net> wrote:
> 
> ISOC isn't holding an actual meeting but conducting the entire caboodle
> online?  But it does cater for when a candidate steps down or if a
> replacement is found during the run up to a vote being held.  But up to
> ten changes? That is an impressive attrition buffer to bloat ;-)!
> 
> 
> C
> 
> Vint Cerf wrote:
>> interestingly, proxy voting in companies does allow vote change up to
>> a date certain.
>> 
>> v
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 5:30 AM, Christian de Larrinaga
>> <cdel at firsthand.net <mailto:cdel at firsthand.net>> wrote:
>> 
>>    It isn't my vote it is the chapter's.
>> 
>>    Actually my concern is that by allowing such an extensive
>>    opportunity to
>>    change votes it opens up a prospect for a dutch auction..  my last
>>    vote
>>    is now for "x" unless  Mssrs "y", "z" or "a" come up with a better
>>    offer.  Not suggesting that offer may be "bitcoins" but ....
>> 
>>    Maybe I'm being unfair. That is why I asked why it is a good idea.
>> 
>>    Also the practicalities of seeking views and involving the whole
>>    chapter
>>    in such an extensive iterative ongoing activity doesn't seem practical
>>    to me.
>> 
>> 
>>    C
>> 
>>    Narelle wrote:
>>> My understanding of the rationale of the online system is that the
>>> voting delegate can change his/her vote up to the cut off time
>>    to give
>>> us a flexible system, allow for additional comment and discussion to
>>> influence your vote.
>>> 
>>> I've never seen this as a forum for "campaigns" per se, though some
>>> have been known to do it.
>>> 
>>> I have no idea why the limit on changes is 10 - I would assume that
>>> was an arbitrary (and imho reasonable) design choice that could be
>>> changed if people really see a need for it.  Presumably
>>    Christian has
>>> hit the limit!
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Christian de Larrinaga
>>> <cdel at firsthand.net <mailto:cdel at firsthand.net>> wrote:
>>>> Why is this a good idea?
>>>> C
>>>> 
>>>> Carlos Vera Quintana wrote:
>>>>> You can change your vote 10 times only :)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Narelle
>>> admittedly a Board member, though speaking as an individual
>>    chapter delegate
>>> 
>>> President
>>> ISOC-AU
>>    _______________________________________________
>>    As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically
>>    subscribed
>>    to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet
>>    Society
>>    Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
> _______________________________________________
> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org