[Chapter-delegates] are there really so few active chapter members?

John Levine isocmember at johnlevine.com
Mon Nov 9 14:24:22 PST 2020


In article <1aff0a6c-7f40-ca54-a6ec-72bcef6b21c7 at gih.com> you write:
>I think there might be a confusion somewhere. Whilst others have 
>focussed on the "leadership" aspect relating to Chapters, my focus is 
>about tagging "individuals who are directly involved in the policy 
>development process of these organisations" like ICANN & IGF. That would 
>be akin to say that anyone in an IETF working group does not qualify.

There is definitely a confusion beause that is not what it says or
what it means. We have interpreted "directly involved in the policy
development process" at ICANN to be what the ICANN bylaws say: the
ICANN board and the policy development organizations ccNSO and GNSO.

Olga has been on the GAC and I've been on the SSAC, neither of which
presents a problem under our CoI policy.

R,s
John

PS: As I would have thought you were aware, we developed the current
CoI policy two years ago at our 2018 board retreat in Uruguay. The
change earlier this year was just a minor twiddle to clarify the
difference between board and staff officers.



More information about the Chapter-delegates mailing list