[Chapter-delegates] FW: Ethos/PIR/ISoc statements regarding ICANN's rejection of the sale of PIR/.ORG

[Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond]

On 05/05/2020 11:33, Richard Hill via Chapter-delegates wrote:
> However, in my view, the allegation that ICANN didn't merely enforce a
> contractual clause, but instead exceeded its mandate and violated its
> bylaws, is a serious attack on ICANN's legitimacy. In my view, such an
> attack should have been consulted with the membership, in keeping with the
> spirit, if not the letter, of the cited policy development process.

It saddens me to have to say that the allegation did not have a place in
an official ISOC comment. It is unsubstantiated, is indeed arguable (for
or against) and I fail to see any benefit to attacking another I-Star
decision, apart from weakening the multistakeholder model as a whole.
Some countries at the ITU must be laughing.
Kindest regards,

Olivier

-- 
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
http://www.gih.com/ocl.html

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20200506/5d48da22/attachment.htm>