[Chapter-delegates] Discussion Paper: An analysis of the “New IP” proposal to the ITU-T

Christian cdel at firsthand.net
Fri Jul 17 03:46:21 PDT 2020


On 16/07/2020 16:26, Andrew Sullivan via Chapter-delegates wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 11:32:08AM +0100, Christian via 
> Chapter-delegates wrote:
>>
>> Thank you for this call in the wilderness. Olaf may well need 
>> reinforcements. ISOC could now gather IETF and W3C and attract the 
>> many others who are developing decentralised protocols and services to 
>
> To be clear, the Internet Society is mostly a convenor in this case:
> much of the contribution to that discussion paper came from people who
> are active in the IETF. 


ISOC is much more than a convenor in that case. It convenes for an open 
interoperable as  openly interconnected Internet where users at the edge 
enjoy permissionless innovation as is possible.

Anything that smacks of building capabilities attempting to "corner the 
market" at any layer or even geography  or topology is surely something 
ISOC needs to call out?


> (The W3C doesn't really work on this layer of
> the stack.)
>
The W3C and its Foundation - different but kindreds have shown deep 
concern that its layer of the stack is being or might be undermined.

There should be a clear meeting of minds and agenda here between ISOC 
and W3C and others..


> Best regards,
>
> A


C

-- 
Christian de Larrinaga
----------------------




More information about the Chapter-delegates mailing list