[Chapter-delegates] Discussion Paper: An analysis of the “New IP” proposal to the ITU-T

[Olaf Kolkman]

Colleagues

There were some requests for a public and archived space for discussion 
of this paper. We set up a list that doesn’t require ISOC membership 
to discuss this paper (and potential future discussion papers).

Hence a friendly amendment to the text below:

We welcome any feedback on “An analysis of the “New IP” proposal 
to the ITU-T”. Contact the authors directly using 
newIP-discussion-paper at isoc.org or post to the 
discussion-papers at elists.isoc.org mailing list, which is public and 
archived.

—Olaf


On 28 Apr 2020, at 10:22, Olaf Kolkman wrote:

> Dear Colleagues,
>
> With the usual cross-post apologies[*].
>
>
> In the run up to the ITU World Telecommunication Standardization 
> Assembly (WTSA-20) later this year there has been some discussion 
> about a proposal called the “New IP”. It is positioned as a 
> top-down architecture to solve a number of use cases that are 
> currently been developed in the ITU-T’s Future Network 2030 Focus 
> Group.
>
> The Internet Society is carefully following the developments in the 
> run-up to WTSA-20. We are trying to understand if and how the New IP 
> works with the Internet as we know it, if it actually solves problems 
> that cannot be solved in the Internet, and, if the ITU-T is developing 
> standards, where other standards development organizations (SDOs) have 
> change control.
>
> In order to get a sense of the environment we commissioned a 
> discussion paper, [“An analysis of the ‘New 
> IP’](https://www.internetsociety.org/resources/doc/2020/discussion-paper-an-analysis-of-the-new-ip-proposal-to-the-itu-t/) 
> proposal to the ITU-T.” The paper helps inform us and the broader 
> community whilst the public debate around these proposals shapes up. 
> It also aims to inform and shape the discussion from the Internet’s 
> Society’s perspective. Eventually the debate around it will inform 
> our position and the potential further evolution of the discussion 
> paper itself. Note that the paper documents the Internet Society’s 
> emerging opinion, but does not represent a final Internet Society 
> position. Instead, we intend it as a means to gather information and 
> insight from our community on the topic.
>
>
> We welcome any feedback on [“An analysis of the ‘New 
> IP’](https://www.internetsociety.org/resources/doc/2020/discussion-paper-an-analysis-of-the-new-ip-proposal-to-the-itu-t/) 
>  via the email address NewIP-Discussion-Paper at isoc.org
>
>
> —Olaf Kolkman
>
> [*] This mail has been sent to various relevant mailing lists and 
> featured as a blog on the Internet Society website.
>
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> -
> Olaf M. Kolkman                                     Tweets as: 
> @kolkman
> Principal - Internet Technology, Policy, and Advocacy
> Internet Society                        
> https://www.internetsociety.org
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> -



- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Olaf M. Kolkman                                     Tweets as: @kolkman
Principal - Internet Technology, Policy, and Advocacy
Internet Society                        https://www.internetsociety.org
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20200429/010ce47e/attachment.htm>