[Chapter-delegates] IGF Ambassadorship Open

Olga Cavalli olgacavalli at gmail.com
Tue Jul 12 19:00:54 PDT 2016 

Thanks Siva,

you read my mind!

There is a strong support to the idea that the rules should be revised,
specially the limit of the 40+

Hopefuly this will be taken in consideration.

Regards to all

Olga

2016-07-12 17:30 GMT-03:00 Sivasubramanian M <isolatedn at gmail.com>:

> Surprised that after all this discussion on the list, the criteria remains
> rigid as framed.
>
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Laurie Patton <ceo at internet.org.au> wrote:
>
>> So you are only interested in new leaders if they are under 40 then?
>>
>> Thanks for making me feel so welcome!
>>
>> LAURIE PATTON
>> Chief Executive Officer | Internet Australia
>>
>> "Helping Shape Our Internet Future"
>>
>> Contacts:
>> Mobile: +61 (0) 418 777700
>> Twitter: @LJPatton
>> LinkedIn: http://linkd.in/LauriePatton
>> Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laurie_Patton
>> Website: www.internet.org.au
>>
>> Note: This email is confidential to the addressees and may contain
>> copyright material. If you are not an intended recipient please do not use,
>> copy or distribute its contents without my permission. All rights reserved.
>>
>> On 8 Jul 2016, at 16:26, Nadira Alaraj <nadira.araj at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1 Alejandro,
>> The IGF Ambassadors program is under the Next Generation Leaders
>> Programme,
>>
>> https://www.internetsociety.org/what-we-do/leadership-programmes/next-generation-leaders-ngl-programme
>>
>> It makes full sense to target younger potential applicants.
>> Interesting to see many of those got involved into the Next Generation
>> Leaders progarmme are leaders in their respective positions.
>>
>> Nadira
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> before everybody gets carried away... has anyone under 40 complained
>>> about ageism yet?
>>>
>>> This policy was established with several purposes and some of them at
>>> least have been fulfilled successfully.
>>>
>>> The premise is that a call based only on grounds of merit and experience
>>> has a strong incentive to end up selecting largely the same set of people
>>> again and again, in a self-reinfocing feedback cycle. (who has more
>>> experience and more extensive networks than those who have attended most
>>> meetings?
>>>
>>> Fresh insights and new people have to come into our system.
>>>
>>> The policy of selecting under-40's has been very successful at least in
>>> our chapter. The members who have attended workshops, IGFs, IETF, and ICANN
>>> meetings have not only acquired knowledge and experience but also networks
>>> of their own, with a younger generation as well as with the old, with
>>> grassroots as well as with staff. Bringing in insights about today's
>>> Internet and looking into its future, strongly committed, highly
>>> motivated.. just what we were 15 or 20 years ago!!
>>>
>>> Now thanks to the policy we have a small group, in our case three layers
>>> deep, of people who can and *will* take the reins of the Chapter in the
>>> near future. So ISOC's pro-under-40 policy is actually helping our
>>> succession planning - isnt' that a major responsibility we have in
>>> chapters? - for free!
>>>
>>> Do we have a problem left to deal with in funding participation for the
>>> most experienced members? yes, no doubt. Olga, you are now a Trustee, it's
>>> upon you (you have the power to change the things you do not like and to
>>> deliver on the promise your statement implies), and on whoever succeeds you
>>> very soon in your position in the Chapter Advisory Council as well.)  (I'm
>>> sure the CHAC is also considering this issue.)
>>>
>>>
>>> Yours,
>>>
>>> Alejandro Pisanty
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:29 PM, David Vyorst <dvyorst at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>> +50
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> David Vyorst
>>>> Co-Founder, Relay Station Digital Strategies
>>>>
>>>> www.relaystationmedia.com
>>>> 202.841.2400
>>>> @dvyo
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Ricardo Holmquist <rihogris at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thank you very much Glenn,
>>>>> Have the same feeling, for the ones over 50 , that actually have to
>>>>> work hard to make the local IGF a reality, with almost no help from the
>>>>> former fellows is discouraging. Hope this changes, not only in ISOC, but in
>>>>> some other I Organizations, where it is not written, but at the end is the
>>>>> main criteria.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best
>>>>>
>>>>> Ricardo Holmquist
>>>>>
>>>>> El Thursday, July 7, 2016, Glenn McKnight <mcknight.glenn at gmail.com>
>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The call for IGF Ambassadors has opened for  IGF Mexico.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Note the limitations
>>>>>> Selection criteria
>>>>>>
>>>>>> IGF Ambassadorships are for young Internet Society members who have a
>>>>>> strong interest in the issues and themes of the IGF. Ambassadorship awards
>>>>>> are available for first-time and returning ambassadors. Selection for the
>>>>>> Ambassadorships is competitive. All applicants must be:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    - *between the ages of 20 and 40*
>>>>>>    - a member of the Internet Society
>>>>>>    - able to present a strong motivation for attending the IGF
>>>>>>    meeting
>>>>>>    - able to demonstrate interest and expertise in issues on the IGF
>>>>>>    agenda
>>>>>>    - able to demonstrate experience in leading Internet governance
>>>>>>    discussions at the international level and in multi-cultural environments
>>>>>>    - capable of appropriately represent the Internet Society and its
>>>>>>    views and policies as an Ambassador during the IGF
>>>>>>    - capable of  continuing to work with the Internet Society
>>>>>>    locally after the IGF.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am curious  how  the  *Internet is for  Everyone, *but why does
>>>>>>  ISOC  continues to limit the ambassadors to under 40 years old.
>>>>>> Interesting since  ARIN  Fellowship or  ICANN has removed this obvious
>>>>>> discrimination against dedicated volunteers
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wonder how many previous candidates actually worked with the local
>>>>>> chapters after the IGF.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Recently at  ICANN  we reviewed all the fellows based upon their
>>>>>>  self-identified sectors and countries and the bias has been for  World
>>>>>> Least Developed economies- this has meant that  US  territories in the
>>>>>> South Pacific,  first Nations,  poor and rural  Americans  were not
>>>>>> eligible.  We have stated for  years that this is unfair to  Canadian and
>>>>>> US  first nations/indigenous ( can be treated as independent tribal
>>>>>> governments) .  ICANN is now  reexamining their criteria with a noteworthy
>>>>>> change to allow first nations people to participate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does anyone else feel  that  ISOC's  ambassador program suffers from
>>>>>> ageism?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Glenn
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Glenn
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Glenn McKnight
>>>>>> mcknight.glenn at gmail.com
>>>>>> skype  gmcknight
>>>>>> twitter gmcknight
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
>>>>> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
>>>>> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
>>>> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
>>>> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>      Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
>>> Facultad de Química UNAM
>>> Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
>>> +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
>>> +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475
>>> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
>>> Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn,
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
>>> ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
>>> .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
>>> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
>>> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and
>> is
>> believed to be clean.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
>> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
>> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
>>
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and
>> is
>> believed to be clean.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
>> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
>> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sivasubramanian M <https://www.facebook.com/sivasubramanian.muthusamy>
>
> _______________________________________________
> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20160712/54be6e24/attachment.htm>

More information about the Chapter-delegates mailing list