[Chapter-delegates] IGF Ambassadorship Open

[Laurie Patton]

Again, at the risk of causing offence, we also need to look at diplomatically respecting the contribution of long term players while encouraging them to make way for new blood, of any age.

LAURIE PATTON
Chief Executive Officer | Internet Australia

"Helping Shape Our Internet Future"

Contacts:
Mobile: +61 (0)418-777700
Twitter: @LJPatton
LinkedIn: http://linkd.in/LauriePatton
Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laurie_Patton
Website: www.internet.org.au

Note: This email is confidential to the addressees and may contain copyright material. If you are not an intended recipient please do not use, copy or distribute its contents without my permission. All rights reserved.

> On 10 Jul 2016, at 9:15 AM, Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear Raul,
> 
> many thanks for your comments.
> 
> You mention that the IGF Ambassador´s program has been successful. In a way I totally agree with you, but perhaps the rules established some years ago (I remember it started in 2009?) may be revised in the ligth of other results of an constantly evolving Internet ecosystem.
> 
> I agree with comments made by James Gannon, which I quote here:
> 
> "I think we need to take a serious look at our ability to engage and manage people who want to get into the nitty gritty details, because we are so incredibly understaffed in that area that its a serious concern of mine. And that means opening our support systems to anyone who can demonstrate knowledge, ability and willingness to perform as a volunteer. Wether these end up as two separate streams of engagement across the various I* organisations is for others to determine, but I do think that we need to realise and accept that we have a capacity problem that we are not fixing despite our efforts, and we should take a hard hard look at excluding potential applicants who can be converted into the people on the front lines, building policy, ensuring our agenda is heard and doing the work. If we exclude these people based on arbitrary criteria then we are doing ourselves a disservice I think. If someone is willing to get involved and do the work I don’t think we should care if they are 18 or 80, from the US or from Uzbekistan, I feel that we almost don’t have that luxury yet, or if we feel we do, then we need a parallel program for those willing to do the heavy lifting."
> 
> Those of us that dedicate our time to actively participate as volunteers in different I* activities, usually see how difficult it is to find participants who engage in a more relevant and deeper level, than just go to the meetings, one or several times.
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Olga
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 2016-07-09 1:22 GMT-03:00 Raul Echeberria <echeberria at isoc.org>:
>> 
>> 
>> Hi everybody
>> 
>> I would like to thank all the comments and feedbacks you have provided in the last few days on this topic.
>> 
>> We have many different programs and different fellows programs that target different audiences. Some are oriented to new leaders, others to policy makers, to technical people or to chapters leaders.
>> Those are programatic decisions based on the objectives of each of the programs which are different among them.
>> For example, the regional Chapters workshops are managed with different criteria. We held the European regional workshop, attended by 23 chapters if I remember well and we will have the LAC one this month in Costa Rica.
>> This is a chapter oriented program, like also Beyond he Net.
>> 
>> The IGF Ambassadors is one of our very successful programs and it is oriented to a given target. We have even received sometimes criticism in the opposite direction of the discussion in this list. Some people think that we should low the age of the participants. I think that the current program is good and it is complementary to other initiatives we have, like the Youth program in which we participated last year together with the CGI Brasil and that we are trying to replicate this year.
>> 
>> I have the opportunity to participate as a Mentor of the IGF Ambassador program the last 2 years and it has been a very good experience. It has been exciting to work with the participants, who represent a good balance between youth and experience and that brings every year new energy to the IGF.
>> 
>> As I said, these are programatic decisions, so they can be always arguable in one direction or another.
>> Can we have other programs? of course! And we do it.
>> Programs and projects evolve all the time looking always for the most effective ways to accomplish our goals and objectives.
>> 
>> I really hope that we have this year once again a good list of candidates for participating in this programa and I encourage you to promote people from your communities to participate.
>> 
>> We appreciate very much your support for the continue success of this program. (and all the other programs, or course)
>> 
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> Raúl
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
>> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
>> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and 
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is 
> believed to be clean.
> _______________________________________________
> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20160710/6e734347/attachment.htm>