[Chapter-delegates] Internet of Things
Jahangir Hossain
jrjahangir at gmail.com
Wed Feb 10 08:03:36 PST 2016
Sam,
I agree with your points specially awareness and engagement by individuals
as "citizens of the Internet" and favorite apps example but still
downloading these apps(as a smart citizens of Internet) :) . My initial
concept about IoT; more sensitive while exchange information within IoT
architecture like critical scenario example; communication between patent
and doctor or hospital .
Now i'm thinking the same framework concept like cloud Private,Community
and Public IoT architecture which could be quite secure based on our demand
. Users and developers can play important role can consider this before
build the infrastructure and applications .
Eric ,
I'm also agree with your point "opportunity for Chapters to be out in front
educating users, governments, and developers about the right way to create
IoT infrastructure and applications".
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 9:09 PM, Sam Lanfranco <sam at lanfranco.net> wrote:
> Jahangir,
>
> Privacy is not dead, but what is needed is much greater awareness and
> engagement by individuals as "citizens of the Internet". If a department
> store, a car repair shop, or a restaurant stopped us at the door and asked
> for all the information a downloaded app asks for (and continues to track)
> when we add our favorite social media, or utility, app to a cell phone, or
> an IoT device, we would be offended and say no. We have an acquired and
> (hopefully) informed sense of self and privacy there, in those literal
> spaces. This is yet to happen in the virtual spaces we occupy. Will we get
> there through awareness and engagement, or through a series of unfortunate
> invasions of privacy? That is hard to say. Will we stand up for a sense of
> self that delineates ourselves as individuals, hopefully within a
> community, or will we allow others to lump us into their marketing
> strategies and schemes for political control? I hope we struggle and opt
> for the former (empowered selves within communities) and not the later
> (powerless consumers). Hope springs eternal .
>
> Sam Lanfranco, ISOC Canada Chapter.
>
> *On 10/02/2016 1:07 AM, Jahangir Hossain wrote:*
>
> *Hi Glenn, *
>
> *Thanks for sharing this news. Now this is seems to be interesting from
> IoT architecture views . Is privacy dead in future technology ?*
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Glenn McKnight <mcknight.glenn at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> US intelligence chief: we might use the internet of things to spy on you
>>
>
>> http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/feb/09/internet-of-things-smart-home-devices-government-surveillance-james-clapper
>>
>>
>> Glenn McKnight
>> mcknight.glenn at gmail.com
>> skype gmcknight
>> twitter gmcknight
>> .
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
>
--
*Regards / Jahangir*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20160210/94df9aef/attachment.htm>
More information about the Chapter-delegates
mailing list