[Chapter-delegates] ChAC Decision Needed: Proposal for greater Chapter participation in developing position & policy briefs

Louis Houle louis.houle at oricom.ca
Thu Aug 25 13:54:57 PDT 2016


+1

Louis Houle
President
ISOC Quebec
Louis.Houle at isoc.quebec

Le 2016-08-21 à 13:40, Alejandro Pisanty a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> it would be easier to discuss if the number "19" were replaced by a 
> percentage or fraction of the total. Some may question regional minima 
> as well.
>
> There will always be a question about large numbers of 
> non-participating chapters - like this decision itself.
>
> Alejandro PIsanty
>
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Jahangir Hossain 
> <jrjahangir at gmail.com <mailto:jrjahangir at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     I strongly support this initiative .
>
>
>
>
>     ​Thank you
>     Jahangir
>     ​Hossain
>     ISOC Bangladesh Chapter
>>
>
>
>     On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 1:11 AM, avri doria <avri at acm.org
>     <mailto:avri at acm.org>> wrote:
>
>         Dear ChAC delegates,
>
>         The ChAC Steering Committee has reviewed "A proposal for greater
>         involvement of Chapters in the position and policy brief
>         development
>         process"  (below & attached) and is submitting it to the
>         Chapter Council
>         for approval.
>
>         Decisions by the ChAC are governed by the Rules & Procedure
>         paragraph 6
>
>         > Substantive decisions, in particular regarding advice and
>         > recommendations, shall be made by the AC. Decisions may be
>         made by
>         > electronic means (e.g. E-Mail, electronic voting systems,
>         etc.) or
>         > during remote (audio/video conferencing) or physical meetings.
>         > Decisions shall normally be taken by consensus (meaning lack
>         of formal
>         > opposition). If consensus cannot be achieved, then the Chair
>         of the AC
>         > Steering Committee shall organize a vote. In case of voting,
>         decisions
>         > shall be taken by a majority vote of the delegates to the
>         AC. The
>         > quorum shall be nineteen (19) delegates. In case of tie, the
>         matter
>         > will be resubmitted for discussion and a new vote. Votes will be
>         > secret. The tally of votes (for, against, abstain, did not
>         vote) will
>         > be published. Abstentions will be counted towards
>         determining the quorum.
>
>         At this point I would like to open discussion on this proposal
>         for the
>         next week - until 8/27 1200 UTC.  At that point I will initiate a
>         consensus call on the document, including any changes that may be
>         warranted as part of the discussion.  This consensus call will
>         also be
>         scheduled for 1 week.  Should the document not meet with
>         consensus, I
>         will then request that we continue discussion on it and will
>         bring it to
>         a vote.
>
>         Thank you
>
>         Avri Doria
>
>         (for the ChAC SC)
>
>
>         -----
>
>         *A proposal for greater involvement of Chapters in the
>         position and
>         policy brief development process*
>
>         *Background*
>
>         In the past, there have been occasions when ISOC staff met
>         with national
>         policy makers without involving the national chapter in any
>         way. Since
>         national chapters often have good relations with national
>         officials, it
>         would be preferable if the chapters are also involved in
>         meetings with
>         national officials. We propose a recommendation below to that
>         effect.
>
>         At present, there does not seem to be a consistent practice
>         within ISOC
>         regarding the role of the membership in the policy development
>         process and the preparation of background and position papers
>         that ISOC
>         puts forward. Specifically, some policy papers are submitted
>         to the
>         membership for comment, specifically the policy briefs, while
>         others
>         papers, such as position papers, are not. In one case, the
>         membership
>         was not informed of a specific submission. It appears to us that
>         systematic consultation with the membership can only improve
>         the quality
>         of a policy, background paper, or position paper. The intent
>         is not to
>         change ISOC's current decision-making process for such papers:
>         staff
>         would remain fully responsible for the final version of the
>         paper. The
>         intent is to allow staff to benefit systematically from the
>         views of the
>         membership, and to decide whether or how to incorporate
>         comments from
>         the membership. We propose a recommendation below to that effect.
>
>
>         *Recommendations*
>
>         Review with the relevant chapters, policy positions and
>         alliances before
>         they are made, and inform them of meetings with national policy
>         makers, unless time constraints do not permit it. We have
>         active mailing
>         lists that can make it quick and easy.
>
>         In general, policy, background and position papers, including
>         policy
>         briefs should be submitted to the membership for comment prior to
>         publication, with the understanding that staff retains full
>         ownership
>         for the final version. Staff can choose the most appropriate
>         method to
>         consult the membership, for example by asking for volunteers
>         to review
>         drafts, by posting a draft for comment to a mailing list, by
>         convening a
>         virtual meeting to discuss the issues, etc.
>
>         Further, when papers are published and/or submitted to some entity
>         outside ISOC, the membership should be informed and a link to
>         the paper
>         should be sent to the appropriate mailing list and to the Chapter
>         Delegate's mailing list just prior to the publication or
>         submission.
>
>
>
>
>         ---
>         This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
>         software.
>         https://www.avast.com/antivirus <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically
>         subscribed
>         to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the
>         Internet Society
>         Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically
>     subscribed
>     to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet
>     Society
>     Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>      Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
> Facultad de Química UNAM
> Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
> +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
> +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475
> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
> Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, 
> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
> ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
> .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20160825/4bb503eb/attachment.htm>


More information about the Chapter-delegates mailing list