[Chapter-delegates] Reminder - Open comment period from ICANN CCWG for new naming proposal

[Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond]

Dear Narelle,

this slide, number 18, is unsubstantiated. I would ignore it.
Ditto for slide 28, 29, 30...

I would be more interested in Slide #19 - this is the issue of
jurisdiction and the proposal so far keeps jurisdiction firmly in the
United States.

Kind regards,

Olivier

On 30/04/2015 09:55, Narelle Clark wrote:
>
> All,
> you may find this further piece interesting also. I admit to being
> deeply concerned and am seeking further clarification.
>
> At the recent ARIN meeting a presentation was given:
> https://www.arin.net/participate/meetings/reports/ARIN_35/PDF/monday/crisp_panel.pdf
>
> Page 18 of the ARIN presentation says:
>
> "ICANN has verbally represented that they will reject any proposed
> agreement
> in which ICANN is not deemed the sole source prime contractor for IANA
> functions in perpetuity.
>
> "ICANN asserts that neither NTIA nor the US Congress will approve any
> transition plan which leaves open the possibility of a future non-US IANA
> Functions Operator."
>
> Milton Mueller has blogged on this:
> http://www.internetgovernance.org/2015/04/28/icann-wants-an-iana-functions-monopoly-and-its-willing-to-wreck-the-transition-process-to-get-it/
> <http://www.internetgovernance.org/2015/04/28/icann-wants-an-iana-functions-monopoly-and-its-willing-to-wreck-the-transition-process-to-get-it/>
>
> An interesting quote from the article:
>
> "Those who claim that ICANN’s good performance of the IANA functions
> in the past, under NTIA supervision, means that we needn’t bother with
> “complex” new organizational arrangements that compensate for the loss
> of NTIA accountability are, we think, being proved wrong. But it’s
> good that this is happening now, before the die is fully cast. Just
> imagine bargaining with ICANN once it has all the marbles.”
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
> Narelle
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Narelle Clark <narelle at isoc-au.org.au
> <mailto:narelle at isoc-au.org.au>> wrote:
>
>     All,
>     we are entering what may be the final stages of the compilation of the
>     proposal for a post-US government stewardship of the IANA functions.
>
>     Like the numbering and protocol parameters groups before them, the
>     names community are in the final phases of compiling a proposal for
>     that final piece of IANA. Their proposal has gone out for public
>     comment, see:
>     https://www.icann.org/public-comments/cwg-stewardship-draft-proposal-2015-04-22-en
>
>     I therefore encourage you to participate in this community exercise.
>
>     A huge thank you must go to everyone who participated in the proposal
>     development for the numbers community (via the CRISP team from the
>     RIRs) and the protocol parameters community (via ianaplan from the
>     IETF). Those proposals are comprehensive indeed:
>
>     Numbers, ie RIR: https://www.nro.net/news/final-proposal-crisp
>     Protocols, ie IETF:
>     https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-09
>
>
>     We will be moving into the final phase soon, so I will need people's
>     thoughts on the overall system proposal: is it appropriate?
>     Have the processes been rigorous and dealt with issues raised within
>     standing community processes?
>     Are the proposals consistent with each other?
>     Will they work together?
>
>     Is anything missing?
>
>
>     Best regards
>
>
>     Narelle
>
>     --
>
>     Narelle Clark
>     ISOC nominee to the IANA Coordination Group
>
>     Immediate Past President and Board Member
>     Internet Society of Australia
>     narelle at internet.org.au <mailto:narelle at internet.org.au>
>     www.internet.org.au <http://www.internet.org.au>
>     The Internet is for Everyone!
>
>
>
>
> -- 
>
>
>
> Narelle Clark
> Immediate Past President and Board Member
> Internet Society of Australia
> ph: 0412 297 043
> int ph: +61 412 297 043
> narelle at isoc-au.org.au <mailto:president at isoc-au.org.au>
> www.isoc-au.org.au <http://www.isoc-au.org.au>
> The Internet is for Everyone!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org

-- 
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
http://www.gih.com/ocl.html

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20150430/80d3c34f/attachment.htm>