[Chapter-delegates] Fighting Homelessness, One Smartphone at a Time
Carlos M. Martinez
carlos at lacnic.net
Fri Apr 17 06:57:13 PDT 2015
The same folk that run "their own" IP over *DSLor FTTH. It's no
different. I can run walled gardens on pure simple Ethernet, in fact,
most enterprise networks do so.
The problem, if there is any, does not lie on technologies, it lies on
business models and business practices.
regards,
-Carlos
On 4/17/15 8:57 AM, Christian de Larrinaga wrote:
> Who is running their own IP layer over LTE 1/2 layer carrier?
>
> C
>
> Carlos M. Martinez wrote:
>> LTE is a L1-L2 technolgy for us Internet folk. It´s no more a walled
>> garden than Ethernet. It´s the use you make of it that matters.
>>
>>
>> On 4/16/15 9:33 AM, Christian de Larrinaga wrote:
>>> LTE is cell model for MITM and walled garden. Just check out VoLTE.
>>>
>>> Has a role to play but like its predecessor IMS. Is not about neutral
>>> carrier.
>>>
>>> On 16 April 2015 12:34:43 BST, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Christian,
>>>
>>> one of the paragraphs in your response particularly intrigued me and I
>>> wonder if I can ask for clarification:
>>>
>>> On 15/04/2015 11:16, Christian de Larrinaga wrote:
>>>
>>> My preference for promoting a platform that would be truly
>>> transformative over wireless would not be cell but wireless
>>> Internet services. That is the only effective way to bring the
>>> power of application and service innovation to the people
>>> locally. It's the difference between being dependent (on cell)
>>> to being in the driving seat (Internet data network) both from
>>> enabling new networks to be set up by people themselves to
>>> their developing and deploying applications.
>>>
>>>
>>> What do you mean by wireless Internet services? Via WIFI?
>>>
>>> I am personally "sold" on LTE. Having used
>>> it in
>>> extensively in
>>> Singapore at 100Mb/s download AND upload, whether outside, in a hotel,
>>> in a taxi, underground, on a subway train. I have no idea how they did
>>> this but LTE worked everywhere. Implemented correctly, LTE really opened
>>> my mind to understand ubiquitous connectivity. I stopped thinking "do I
>>> have Internet?" and made constant use of my mobile to help me find my
>>> way in an unknown environment - so much so that I felt like I "belonged"
>>> there. I can see the benefit of such service for trade and exchange at
>>> all levels, both in developed and in developing economies.
>>> All to say that I have real concerns about another technology gap
>>> opening: reliable, fast LTE or not.
>>>
>>> To summarise, I really believe the mobile Internet is an opportunity for
>>> all countries but in the current arms race where "faster is better"
>>> whilst the principles are great, the infrastructure costs are going to
>>> put a serious strain on
>>> developing country economies.
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>> Olivier
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
>>> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
>>> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
More information about the Chapter-delegates
mailing list