[Chapter-delegates] New Blog: ITU Plenipotentiary 2014 Opens

Veni Markovski veni at veni.com
Mon Oct 20 18:41:30 PDT 2014


I am also a little bit wondering what's the role of the ITU in national 
security issues?
Now, of course, I am against *any* type of wiretapping (including 
legal), but that's only because I grew up in a country, where ALL 
communications were monitored 24x7. So, the first 21 years of my life 
were spent in all-wired environment. There were more microphones around 
my house, than there were at the National Public Radio.
But the ITU and these issues?

v.

On 10/20/14 21:37, Alejandro Pisanty wrote:
> Richard,
>
> what would the ITU do regarding privacy and surveillance? 
> Traditionally it has been the seat of authorized and then overarching 
> pro-surveillance arrangements. They are deeply rooted in the ITRs, as 
> is the "kill switch". What depth of reform would be required to 
> reverse the trend? ITRs? WCIT? Convention? Constitution?
>
> Yours,
>
> Alejandro Pisanty
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:15 AM, Richard Hill <rhill at hill-a.ch 
> <mailto:rhill at hill-a.ch>> wrote:
>
>     Thanks for this.  I would add one item to the list of groups of
>     issues:
>     * How to address concerns regarding mass surveillance and
>     privacy?  Several countries have made proposals to address these
>     topics.
>
>         -----Original Message-----
>         *From:* Chapter-delegates
>         [mailto:chapter-delegates-bounces at elists.isoc.org
>         <mailto:chapter-delegates-bounces at elists.isoc.org>]*On Behalf
>         Of *Wende Cover
>         *Sent:* lundi, 20. octobre 2014 02:01
>         *To:* chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
>         <mailto:chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org>
>         *Subject:* [Chapter-delegates] New Blog: ITU Plenipotentiary
>         2014 Opens
>
>         Hello everyone – Sally Wentworth just posted a blog with
>         insights on several key issues to watch at the ITU
>         Plenipotentiary.  The blog is pasted below or you can read it
>         on our website:
>
>         http://www.internetsociety.org/blog/public-policy/2014/10/itu-plenipotentiary-2014-opens
>
>         Regards, Wende
>
>         ITU Plenipotentiary 2014 Opens
>
>         By Sally Wentworth, Vice President of Global Policy Development
>
>         The ITU Plenipotentiary Conference opens today, and I wanted
>         to share some thoughts on several of the key issues that we’ll
>         be watching over the next three weeks of debate.  Last week,
>         our CEO, Kathryn Brown, outlined the Internet Society’s high
>         level approach to the Conference and offered insights on the
>         importance of collaboration within the Internet ecosystem.
>         Today, I’ll get into a few more specifics.
>
>         An ITU Plenipotentiary Conference is a complex treaty-writing
>         event held every 4 years where governments of the world debate
>         a multitude of issues around how the ITU should function, who
>         should lead the organization, what the ITU should be doing,
>         and how much the ITU’s budget should be. While these are all
>         important issues, the Internet Society’s focus will be on the
>         host of Internet issues that will be considered and on how the
>         decisions made will impact the broader Internet ecosystem.
>
>         As of this writing, proposals are still coming in from regions
>         and Member States but we do already have a general view of
>         what some of the key Internet topics will be.  We are working
>         hard to analyze the various proposals from the perspective of
>         an open and accessible Internet and are keeping an issues
>         matrix updated on our website:
>         www.internetsociety.org/issuesmatrixpp14
>         <http://www.internetsociety.org/issuesmatrixpp14>
>
>         In thinking about the Conference as it relates to the
>         Internet, I see several groups of issues that governments will
>         debate:
>
>         • How the ITU does its work – should the work of the ITU be
>         made more inclusive, more transparent and more collaborative? 
>         This issue will be addressed via consideration of access to
>         ITU documents, publications and meetings.  Thus far, we see
>         divisions among countries emerging on this point.
>
>         • What is the ITU’s role in different aspects of the
>         Internet?  This includes discussion of IP-based networks,
>         Internet policymaking, security, Internet-of-things, and IP
>         addressing.
>
>         • What can the ITU do to expand connectivity and spur
>         development?  There is keen interest to build on the success
>         of the ITU Development conference earlier this year
>         http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Conferences/WTDC/WTDC14/Pages/default.aspx
>         and find ways to bring about the benefits of ICTs.
>
>         • How to address the economic concerns of countries?  Several
>         countries have made proposals to address topics around
>         regulation of over-the-top services, interconnection rates and
>         policies for alternative calling procedures.
>
>         Naturally, within any negotiation, there are opportunities for
>         positive outcomes and also areas of deep concern.  While the
>         bottom-up, collaborative model of development has proven
>         itself when it comes to the Internet, not all countries are
>         willing to accept greater inclusiveness and transparency. In
>         some proposals, we see an emphasis on nation-state solutions
>         in areas where greater cooperation would produce more robust
>         results.
>
>         The promise of the Internet to connect the unconnected, break
>         down barriers, and transform lives depends on collaboration
>         between all engaged and informed stakeholders. The Internet
>         Society is committed to collaborating with partner
>         organizations in every region of the world to increase access
>         to the Internet to further spur economic and social
>         development.  We look forward to a collaborative and
>         productive dialogue in Busan and a positive outcome for the
>         future of the Internet.
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically
>     subscribed
>     to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet
>     Society
>     Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>      Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
> Facultad de Química UNAM
> Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
> +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
> +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475
> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
> Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, 
> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
> ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
> .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org

-- 

Best,
Veni Markovski
http://www.veni.com
https://www.facebook.com/venimarkovski
https://twitter.com/veni

The opinions expressed above are those of the
author, not of any organizations, associated
with or related to him in any given way.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20141020/5be04193/attachment.htm>


More information about the Chapter-delegates mailing list