[Chapter-delegates] [European-chapters] ECJ: Internet search engine's data processing responsibilities

[CW Mail]

Good morning:	I share Richard's reading of the ECJ judgement.
No doubt authoritative interpretation will emerge in due course.

CW



On 14 May 2014, at 06:40, rhill <rhill at hill-a.ch> wrote:

> As I understand the situation,  the complainant did also sue the original Spanish source,  but the court held that the original publication was legal. 
> 
> So it seems to me that what is significant about this case is the ruling that compling and making easily acesssible by searching on a person's name a complilation of information may violate European privacy law if the person requests that some infomation not be displayed even if the information itself is publicly available. 
> 
> Best Richard
> 
> 
> Sent from Samsung Mobile
> 
> 
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Matthew Ford
> Date:13/05/2014 14:03 (GMT+01:00)
> To: Vint Cerf
> Cc: Delegates Chapter ,European Chapters ,Elist publicpolicy ,Privacy list
> Subject: Re: [Chapter-delegates] ECJ: Internet search engine's data processing responsibilities
> 
> +1. And why did the complainant sue Google and not the original (Spanish) source? It seems like a really hard way to go about not achieving what you want.
> 
> Mat
> 
> On 13 May 2014, at 11:55, Vint Cerf <vint at google.com> wrote:
> 
> > indexing crawlers just reflect what is on the web. Erasing links would require the crawler to REMEMBER what it is supposed to erase, even if the content is actually still on the web. Eventually you might end up having to remember more than there is on the web! Even if the content that was indexed went away, you would still have to remember in case it came back. This makes no sense to me.
> > 
> > v
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:13 AM, Frédéric Donck <donck at isoc.org> wrote:
> > Dear All
> > 
> > 
> > Please find below a very important decision from the European Court of Justice.
> > In short, in its ruling from 13 May [Google vs Spanish Data Protection Agency (AEPD)], the Court of Justice of the European Union stated that an operator of Internet search engine is responsible for the processing that it carries out of personal data which appear on web pages published by third parties. More details in the attach. I would be interested to hear your views.
> > 
> > We shall address it in our next EU newsletter but felt that the information deserved immediate distribution.
> >  
> > Best Regards
> > Frederic
> > 
> > Frederic Donck
> > Director European Regional Bureau
> > Internet Society
> > 
> > www.isoc.org
> > 
> > Début du message réexpédié :
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
> > to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
> > Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
> > to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
> > Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer of the European
> region you are automatically subscribed to this list,
> which is regularly synchronized with the Internet
> Society Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20140514/2d30fd96/attachment.htm>