[Chapter-delegates] ECJ: Internet search engine's data processing responsibilities

[Vint Cerf]

indexing crawlers just reflect what is on the web. Erasing links would
require the crawler to REMEMBER what it is supposed to erase, even if the
content is actually still on the web. Eventually you might end up having to
remember more than there is on the web! Even if the content that was
indexed went away, you would still have to remember in case it came back.
This makes no sense to me.

v



On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:13 AM, Frédéric Donck <donck at isoc.org> wrote:

>  Dear All
>
>  Please find below a very important decision from the European Court of
> Justice.
> In short, in its ruling<http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2014-05/cp140070en.pdf>
>  from 13 May [Google vs Spanish Data Protection Agency (AEPD)], the Court
> of Justice of the European Union stated that an operator of Internet search
> engine is responsible for the processing that it carries out of personal
> data which appear on web pages published by third parties. More details in
> the attach. I would be interested to hear your views.
>
>  We shall address it in our next EU newsletter but felt that the
> information deserved immediate distribution.
>
> Best Regards
> Frederic
>
> Frederic Donck
> Director European Regional Bureau
> Internet Society
>
> www.isoc.org
>
> Début du message réexpédié :
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20140513/ffa97a64/attachment.htm>