[Chapter-delegates] [IANAxfer] [Internet Policy] An initial proposalregarding IANA development

[Sabrina Wilmot]

Begin forwarded message:

Carlos, I would agree except for one thing: ICANN Compliance needs focus and strengthening in almost all areas if it is to function as it should even now, and even more is needed in transition.

Michael R. Graham

[cid:EE3EA523-8681-47FF-A37F-DDCFBCC5D659]
Notice: The material in this transmission may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure or use of this information by you is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please delete it, destroy all copies and notify Gnosis IP Law, P.C.<applewebdata://70EB7DAF-F244-4463-8527-0665CA8C4AA8/mgraham@gnosisiplaw.com> by return e-mail or by telephone at (847) 997-4223. Thank you.

From: "Carlos Raúl G." <carlosraulg at gmail.com<mailto:carlosraulg at gmail.com>>
Date: Thursday, March 27, 2014 at 7:58 PM
To: Vint Cerf <vint at google.com<mailto:vint at google.com>>
Cc: ISOC Chapter Delegates <chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org<mailto:chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org>>, "internetpolicy at elists.isoc.org<mailto:internetpolicy at elists.isoc.org>" <internetpolicy at elists.isoc.org<mailto:internetpolicy at elists.isoc.org>>, "ianaxfer at elists.isoc.org<mailto:ianaxfer at elists.isoc.org>" <ianaxfer at elists.isoc.org<mailto:ianaxfer at elists.isoc.org>>, ICT Barrett <ictbarrett at gmail.com<mailto:ictbarrett at gmail.com>>
Subject: Re: [IANAxfer] [Internet Policy] [Chapter-delegates] An initial proposalregarding IANA development

Vint,

As part of my experience in ATRT2, there is quite good accountability and transparency on the policy development process (if you help GAC along), there could be a little more on the compliance side (ccTLDs in particular), but there is little or no recourse beyond the level of the same Board that approves the policy.

I share the idea that no new entities are needed, just some clearer separation between a) policy, b) compliance and c) operations for the benefit of clarity for a wider public.

Cheers

Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
+506 8335 2487
Enviado desde mi iPhone

El 27/03/2014, a las 18:31, Vint Cerf <vint at google.com<mailto:vint at google.com>> escribió:

i think it is quite conceivable that no new institution is needed - what is required is a process by which ICANN delivers on transparency and accountability processes (note plural). When issues arise, there should be recourse mechanisms and options in place. We have some, now, but I think they could use some refinement and strengthening.

vint



On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:28 PM, "Carlos Raúl G." <carlosraulg at gmail.com<mailto:carlosraulg at gmail.com>> wrote:
Then it's only about a separate/different oversight, I would guess?

Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
+506 8335 2487<tel:%2B506%208335%202487>
Enviado desde mi iPhone

El 27/03/2014, a las 18:26, Vint Cerf <vint at google.com<mailto:vint at google.com>> escribió:

there is already separation within ICANN. IANA is isolated from policymaking practices.

vint




On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:14 PM, ICT Barrett <ictbarrett at gmail.com<mailto:ictbarrett at gmail.com>> wrote:
Richard

I think there should be a separation as IANA performs their function well and the stability of the internet from an infrastructure point of view shouldn't get affected by the policy making process ( taking note that once policy is decided it would impact on operations ). But I don't this we should mess with IANAs technical operational processes now.

Cheers
Kerry-Ann

> On Mar 28, 2014, at 12:37 AM, Tamer Rizk <trizk at inficron.com<mailto:trizk at inficron.com>> wrote:
>
Michael R. Graham
Mchaelgraham at comcast.net<mailto:Mchaelgraham at comcast.net>


[cid:EE3EA523-8681-47FF-A37F-DDCFBCC5D659]

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20140329/c9db2b05/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: EE3EA523-8681-47FF-A37F-DDCFBCC5D659.png
Type: image/png
Size: 46007 bytes
Desc: EE3EA523-8681-47FF-A37F-DDCFBCC5D659.png
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20140329/c9db2b05/attachment.png>