[Chapter-delegates] An initial proposal regarding IANA development
Veni Markovski
veni at veni.com
Sun Mar 23 18:18:15 PDT 2014
Alejandro, needless to say, but still, +1.
I would also add that this year we have not only the discussion on the
IANA developments, but also several meetings, where ISOC will be a
participant, and could be a key participant. NetMondial is in a month,
so perhaps not enough time to engage the chapters, but the ITU Plenipot
is in October/November, so plenty of time.
We, at ISOC-Bulgaria have shown in the last couple of months, by way of
example, how one chapter could engage nationally - through the
government - and become part of the discussion around international
Internet-related public policy issues. I distributed the request for
comments by the Bulgarian Telecom Ministry, and then our contribution,
and then the Ministry's contribution to the ITU. Those of you, who've
read the documents, have noticed that the governmental policy was
clearly influenced by the chapter. And, I should add, vice versa, as we
work with the government in a very positive way, which is not only one-way.
Ready to discuss any issues with the folks from ISOC HQ, and they could
reach out to our key project leaders, Julia Velkova and Dessi Greve
(CC:ed here) with direct emails.
We, the chapters, have features that ISOC doesn't - being local,
national, and only in good sync with ISOC HQ we could all do a little,
which, when put together, will mean a lot.
v.
On 03/23/14 18:46, Alejandro Pisanty wrote:
> Kathy,
>
> thanks for your attentive and timely response.
>
> I will not be in Singapore. But this is not about me; I am sure you
> will find plenty of experience, drive, knowledge, intelligence and a
> strong will to work among those who convene in Singapore and the many
> who won't.
>
> One possible way to proceed is to start analyzing and building up
> proposals, maybe along the lines you sent if the community agrees so,
> in working groups (or only one) of Chapter delegates, members, staff,
> and Trustees. When ISOC makes a statement about the future of the NTIA
> function it will be of such existential importance to ISOC that it
> better have all involved, with strong legitimacy and buy-in. The
> Chapters are uniquely positioned to perceive, interpret and express
> the international reactions to some of the possible measures that will
> be proposed and to build a robust, responsive mechanism, as well as to
> help educate and involve communities and authorites in each Chapter's
> environment. There is plenty of positive experience and lessons
> learned to build upon.
>
> Further, it should not be hard for ISOC staff to collect the
> contributions of ISOC members and Chapter delegates made to key
> documents and venues like the different ICANN Strategy Panel reports
> (all of them) and discussions in the official, if derelict, list of
> 1Net. A working group among the ones proposed in the previous
> paragraph could extract what is helpful from that.
>
> While at it, the Board of Trustees and you could look at the work
> being done for the Chapters Advisory Council, as it painfully
> progresses, and clarify any possible issues management may have with
> it - strictly from a legal or fiscal point of view, of course, i.e.
> without curtailing the Chapters' own bottom-up construction of it.
>
> Yours,
>
> Alejandro Pisanty
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Kathy Brown <brown at isoc.org
> <mailto:brown at isoc.org>> wrote:
>
> Alejandro,
>
> Thank you for your note. I am anxious to understand further how
> you would like to proceed. Are you here in Singapore? Is it
> possible to meet?
>
> I have, indeed, read your very excellent report. It seems there
> will begin, today, here at ICANN in Singapore, a dialogue with the
> whole of the community present around what I think of as two
> related issues: the globalization of the IANA function and what is
> being termed as the accountability of ICANN in a post-NTIA world.
> There is a great deal of good thinking by stakeholders with
> diverse perspectives on each of these issues. I think it is
> necessary that I listen carefully.
>
> I also have a number of opportunities to meet with Chapter members
> in smaller settings. Perhaps we can deepen the conversation there.
> Best, Kathy
>
> On Mar 24, 2014, at 1:47 AM, "Alejandro Pisanty"
> <apisanty at gmail.com <mailto:apisanty at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> Kathy,
>>
>> as the discussions on the NTIA-function transfer move forward all
>> organizations involved will be subject to strong scrutiny (we are
>> already witnessing some of that, e.g. regarding financial support
>> for the IETF.) As of now ISOC leadership would do well to begin
>> walking the walk of bottom-up (we've seen you talk the talk; that
>> stage should be over.) A good sign of this would be the proactive
>> involvement of the Trustees, particularly those elected by
>> Chapters vote, in discussions with Chapters and members.
>>
>> For guidance in making some of the very general statements in
>> your message more concrete and actionable, may I suggest the
>> study of the report by the Strategy Panel on ICANN's Role in the
>> Internet Governance Ecosystem (of which I'm proud to have been a
>> member), esp. the section on Principles which is geared to this
>> very process. The report is available in
>> https://www.icann.org/en/about/planning/strategic-engagement/governance-ecosystem/report-23feb14-en.pdf
>> and more documentation in
>> https://www.icann.org/en/about/planning/strategic-engagement/governance-ecosystem
>>
>> A number of ISOC members, including Chapter delegates, have been
>> putting up quite a fight for the principles that hold us
>> together. Recognition of their activities and, more importantly,
>> arguments, is in order.
>>
>> Let's hope the meeting among ISOC leaders and members in
>> Singapore shows this urgent major shift, closes the
>> leadership-members gap (chasm), and produces workable agreements
>> that are set into action immediately.
>>
>> Yours,
>>
>> Alejandro Pisanty
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 4:39 AM, Kathy Brown <brown at isoc.org
>> <mailto:brown at isoc.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Colleagues,
>>
>> The U.S. Department of Commerce National Telecommunications &
>> Information Administration (NTIA) recently announced its
>> intent to step back from its stewardship of the IANA
>> functions. This is an important step for the global Internet.
>>
>> NTIA has asked ICANN to convene a process to plan the
>> transition of the IANA functions to a global multistakeholder
>> model. This process presents an opportunity for stakeholders
>> to consider, discuss and forge agreements on a number of
>> important issues concerning roles, responsibilities and
>> accountability mechanisms for the continued deployment and
>> evolution of a global, robust and trusted Internet. In the
>> weeks ahead, it is imperative to discuss these issues in an
>> open and inclusive manner in a variety of organizations and
>> forums.
>>
>> An issue that has been given some attention by the technical
>> partners administering the names, numbers and protocol
>> parameter aspects of the IANA functions is the various roles
>> on policy that these partners play with respect to the
>> current administration of those functions. In the past
>> months, there has been an ongoing dialogue among the I*
>> individuals who currently lead the respective organizations
>> around how these roles should be viewed going forward, after
>> the US steps back from its current role.
>>
>> The formulation below is offered as a starting point, in what
>> I hope will be an active, robust discussion as we forge
>> consensus on a true multistakeholder approach to the
>> administration of the technical functions of the Internet.
>>
>> We have set up a dedicated email list
>> (ianaxfer at elists.isoc.org <mailto:ianaxfer at elists.isoc.org>)
>> for the Internet Society community, and invite you to subscribe:
>>
>> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer
>>
>> I encourage you to distribute this information within your
>> communities as well.
>>
>> We will look forward to your input and ideas, and will be
>> working to actively engage you as developments and
>> discussions progress.
>>
>> Kathy Brown
>>
>> -----
>>
>> An initial proposal:
>>
>> In order to ensure global acceptance and affirmation of
>> ICANN's role as administrator of the IANA functions, we are
>> now pursuing the transition of USG's stewardship of the IANA
>> functions from the USG to ICANN. The roles of all Internet
>> registry policy bodies (such as the RIRs, IAB, IETF, ASO,
>> ccNSO, ccTLD ROs, and gNSO) stay unchanged. These bodies
>> continue to hold policy authority for the protocol parameter,
>> number, and name spaces, including responsibility to ensure
>> the faithful registry implementation according to those policies.
>>
>> This transition from the USG has been envisaged since the
>> early days of ICANN. It is now feasible due to the growing
>> maturity of ICANN and other organisations in the Internet
>> ecosystem. ICANN's structures and accountability mechanisms
>> continue to evolve and advance guided by the AoC community
>> reviews, including ATRT. In addition, ICANN will continue to
>> embrace its aggressive roadmap to truly globalize its structures.
>>
>> In order to operationalize the transition from USG, ICANN
>> will engage with the Internet community in a bottom-up public
>> consultation process to ensure appropriate accountability
>> mechanisms. In addition, ICANN will work with the names,
>> numbers, and protocol communities to formalize relationships,
>> commitments, and mutual responsibilities.
>>
>> When community stakeholders have input about the policies
>> emanating from the names, numbers, and protocol communities,
>> they would be directed to pursue their interests through the
>> relevant Internet communities (such as the gNSO, ccNSO, ccTLD
>> ROs, ASO, IAB, IETF, or the RIRs) and their mechanisms for
>> consideration and potential redress.
>>
>> The IETF, IAB, and RIRs are committed to open and transparent
>> processes. They also are committed to the role of ICANN as
>> the IANA protocol parameter and IP address registry operator.
>> The accountability mechanisms for ICANN's administration of
>> these core internet functions will provide escalation routes
>> that assure the names, numbers, and protocol communities that
>> if IANA's performance is lacking, those communities can
>> pursue defined processes for improving performance, including
>> pre-agreed independent 3rd party arbitration processes.
>>
>> ICANN reaffirms its commitment to implement all IANA registry
>> functions in accordance with the respective policies. ICANN
>> will also provide affirmations to all stakeholders (including
>> governments) from all Internet registry policy bodies and
>> itself that all of us will use open and transparent processes.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically
>> subscribed
>> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the
>> Internet Society
>> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>> Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
>> Facultad de Química UNAM
>> Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
>> +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
>> +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475
>> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
>> Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn,
>> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614>
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
>> ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
>> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>
>
>
>
> --
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
> Facultad de Química UNAM
> Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
> +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
> +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475
> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
> Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn,
> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
> ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
--
Best,
Veni Markovski
http://www.veni.com
https://www.facebook.com/venimarkovski
https://twitter.com/veni
The opinions expressed above are those of the
author, not of any organizations, associated
with or related to him in any given way.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20140323/f70cc6f2/attachment.htm>
More information about the Chapter-delegates
mailing list