[Chapter-delegates] ITU - WG on Internet Public Policy Issues

Veni Markovski veni at veni.com
Tue Jan 28 12:08:36 PST 2014


Hi.
See attached the contribution from Bulgaria, sent to the Ministry in a 
timely manner. I am sending you just the English part of it, there was a 
letter in Bulgarian, too. Hope that other chapters have managed to help 
their own governments, as well.

best,
veni



On 12/23/13 02:38, Władysław Majewski wrote:
> Just FYI: Polish Ministry of Administration and Digitalizion started 
> public consultation on December, 11th:
> https://mac.gov.pl/dzialania/grupa-robocza-itu-zbiera-informacje-o-polityce-w-sprawie-internetu-w-krajach-czlonkowskich-onz/ 
>
>
> Additionally on December, 19th they send an invitation to ISOC Polska 
> and 10 other IT-related organizations (including Industry Chambers and 
> two of our close allies: Modern Poland Fundation and Panoptykon 
> Fundation).
>
> Consultation period ends January, 20th.
>
> My first personal reaction was... mixed. Should we legitimize ITU 
> efforts to gain a reports about progress in areas which have nothing 
> to do with ITU mission and real activities?
>
> Nevertheless it is a chance to include something important into 
> Government's report. So probably the best way is to provide an input 
> about what the real problems are, what was done about them, how was it 
> done and by whom. In wider perspective Civil Society, including 
> Internet Society, IETF, IGF participants, Privacy advocates did a lot. 
> Governments and their umbrellas - not that much.
>
>
>
>
> 2013/12/23 Veni Markovski <veni at veni.com <mailto:veni at veni.com>>
>
>     Dear all,
>
>     The Bulgarian ministry of telecom has just started a public
>     comment period on the questionnaire we discussed with Sally:
>
>     http://www.mtitc.government.bg/page.php?category=106&id=6917
>
>     They accept comments on 3 questions - the original from the ITU
>     (we listed below earlier), plus two more:
>
>     2) What is the ITU role to encourage governments in their work on
>     Internet-related public policy?
>     3) Which international organizations/forums are best for getting
>     governmental support on those issues, related to Internet public
>     policy?
>
>     Anyone can participate, deadline: January 14. Let me know, if you
>     have comments. ISOC-Bulgaria will be sending some, so feel free to
>     forward anything you feel appropriate.
>
>     veni.
>
>
>
>     On 11/27/13 11:22, Sally Wentworth wrote:
>>     Hi all
>>
>>     In all the list traffic over recent days, I wanted to underscore
>>     Veni's excellent note below regarding the ITU Council Working
>>     Group on international Internet public policy issues. This is a
>>     good opportunity for Chapters to work with their national
>>     governments to help shape gov't input to the group.   As many of
>>     you did in the run-up to WCIT, this is also a chance to encourage
>>     your government to have an open and inclusive process for
>>     addressing this activity as well as in their preparations for
>>     upcoming ITU Conferences like the World Telecom Development
>>     Conference and the ITU Plenipotentiary Conference.   These events
>>     seem like they are a long way off but, as you can see from Veni's
>>     note, the work is already underway to prepare.
>>
>>     Veni's message spells out the details quite well so please read
>>     that carefully.  As you'll see, the ITU Group is considering a
>>     number of very important Internet issues.
>>
>>     As you reach out to policymakers in your country,  you may also
>>     wish to share your experiences with other chapters so we can all
>>     learn from one another about your experience and what is
>>     happening at the local level.
>>
>>     Kind regards,
>>     Sally
>>
>>
>>     Sally Wentworth
>>     Senior Director, Strategic Public Policy
>>     Internet Society
>>     +1 703 439 2146 <tel:%2B1%20703%20439%202146>
>>     wentworth at isoc.org <mailto:wentworth at isoc.org>
>>     www.isoc.org <http://www.isoc.org>
>>
>>     On Nov 16, 2013, at 1:12 PM, Veni Markovski <veni at veni.com
>>     <mailto:veni at veni.com>> wrote:
>>
>>>     After my initial reaction, and positive feedback I am getting
>>>     from you, I decided it's a good time to share something we have
>>>     prepared couple of days ago, which fits perfect in Lynn's
>>>     informative message:
>>>
>>>
>>>     ISOC-Bulgaria has been following the developments around
>>>     Internet governance on the global arena since 2001, when we
>>>     started participate in the WSIS process. Our representatives
>>>     supported the efforts of the Bulgarian government to make sure
>>>     the Internet is developed in an open, bottom-up, and transparent
>>>     way.
>>>     Last week in Geneva (November 11-12) at the ITU there was a
>>>     meeting of the ITU Council Working Group
>>>     <http://www.itu.int/council/groups/CWG-internet/index.html> on
>>>     international Internet-related public policy issues. The group
>>>     finished its discussions with a question that the ITU will send
>>>     to all member states (note – that means to governments!), and
>>>     the text accepted by the group is:
>>>
>>>     “Recognizing the scope of work of ITU on international
>>>     Internet-related public policy matters, represented by the list
>>>     of topics in Council Resolution 1305 Annex 1 which was
>>>     established in accordance with decisions of ITU membership at
>>>     the Plenipotentiary Conference, the Council Working Group on
>>>     International Internet Related Public Policy invites Member
>>>     States to provide their position on following question:
>>>
>>>     Q1. What actions have been undertaken or to be undertaken by
>>>     governments in relations to each of the international
>>>     Internet-related public policy issues identified in Annex 1 to
>>>     Resolution 1305 (adopted by Council 2009 at the seventh Plenary
>>>     Meeting)?”
>>>
>>>     Annex 1 gives the following issues:
>>>     - Multilingualization of the Internet Including
>>>     Internationalized (multilingual) Domain Names
>>>     - International Internet Connectivity
>>>     - International public policy issues pertaining to the Internet
>>>     and the management of Internet resources, including domain names
>>>     and addresses
>>>     - The security, safety, continuity, sustainability, and
>>>     robustness of the Internet
>>>     - Combating Cybercrime
>>>     - Dealing effectively with spam
>>>     - Issues pertaining to the use and misuse of the Internet
>>>     - Availability, affordability, reliability, and quality of
>>>     service, especially in the developing world
>>>     - Contributing to capacity building for Internet governance in
>>>     developing countries
>>>     - Developmental aspects of the Internet
>>>     - Respect for privacy and the protection of personal information
>>>     and data
>>>     - Protecting children and young people from abuse and exploitation)
>>>
>>>
>>>     ISOC-Bulgaria urges all ISOC chapters around the world, but also
>>>     Internet Service Providers, Regional Internet Registries,
>>>     Internet-related companies and organizations that are involved
>>>     in any of the 12 issues, to reach out to their governments, and
>>>     help them explain to the ITU what actions are being undertaken
>>>     in their respected countries or territories.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     *Why is it important? *
>>>
>>>     For several reasons.
>>>
>>>     There are views at the ITU that the organization should “take
>>>     care” of the Internet. Different countries understand it
>>>     differently. The ITU itself has been talking about “establishing
>>>     international control over the Internet using the monitoring and
>>>     supervisory capabilities of the ITU”.
>>>
>>>     Some countries believe that governments play too small role in
>>>     the Internet coordination on a world scale, and believe that
>>>     they should take care of all the 12 issues listed above.
>>>
>>>     Some countries say that there should be regulation of Internet
>>>     content, access to the Net, and some request web sites to be
>>>     registered with the government, and content providers to be
>>>     responsible for published content. Others claim that this is
>>>     impossible to achieve because of the nature of the Internet.
>>>     Some believe that the current Internet is not well designed and
>>>     built, and there should be a new internet developed, by
>>>     governments, which will be more secure, and without spam,
>>>     harmful content, etc.
>>>
>>>     There are, in general, two views of development of the Internet.
>>>     The President of Estonia covered both views
>>>     <http://www.president.ee/en/official-duties/speeches/7589-the-president-of-estonia-at-the-international-conference-of-cyber-conflict-8-june-2012/>
>>>     in his speech at a conference last year in Tallinn.
>>>     ISOC – Bulgaria dealt with these issues back in 1999, when it
>>>     filed a case <http://isoc.bg/kpd> against the government at the
>>>     Supreme Administrative Court, and reached an out-of-court
>>>     agreement to get rid of any licenses or registrations about
>>>     ISPs, content, or any Internet-related business.
>>>
>>>     We would like to see Bulgaria’s leading role on the ITU
>>>     question, and we are hopeful that other countries will also step
>>>     in, and will share their positive experience in the Internet
>>>     pubic policy that they have accepted within their national
>>>     territories. Bulgaria, by the way, did that in an official
>>>     information document
>>>     <http://isocbg.wordpress.com/2010/10/20/bg-itu/>, submitted to
>>>     the ITU Plenipotentiary Conference in 2010.
>>>
>>>
>>>     Best,
>>>     Veni
>>>
>>>     http://www.isoc.bg <http://www.isoc.bg/>
>>>
>>>
>>>     On 11/15/13 23:19, Lynn St.Amour wrote:
>>>>     Dear Chapter leaders,
>>>>
>>>>     Please find the second of what is planned to be regular updates
>>>>     on key Internet governance activities.  Future updates will
>>>>     be shorter.  The background included here is to help layout
>>>>     today’s overall environment.
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically
>>>     subscribed
>>>     to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet
>>>     Society
>>>     Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
>>
>
>     -- 
>
>     Best,
>     Veni Markovski
>     http://www.veni.com
>     https://www.facebook.com/venimarkovski
>     https://twitter.com/veni
>
>     The opinions expressed above are those of the
>     author, not of any organizations, associated
>     with or related to him in any given way.
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically
>     subscribed
>     to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet
>     Society
>     Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> W Majewski

-- 

Best,
Veni Markovski
http://www.veni.com
https://www.facebook.com/venimarkovski
https://twitter.com/veni

The opinions expressed above are those of the
author, not of any organizations, associated
with or related to him in any given way.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20140128/e0092a2b/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: isoc-statement-on MTIT questionnaire 2014 january - ENG only.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 200765 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20140128/e0092a2b/attachment.pdf>


More information about the Chapter-delegates mailing list