[Chapter-delegates] Weekly European Regional Bureau Newsletter: EU Overview

[Richard Hill]

Dear Veni,

I agree with you, neither the Tunis Agenda nor the NETmundial outcome give veto power to anybody, and that is as it should be.

A model in which all stakeholders make all decisions on the basis of consenus could give veto power to any stakeholder (depending on how you define consensus), but the NETmundial outcome does not envisage that model.

Best,
Richard

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Veni Markovski [mailto:venimarkovski at gmail.com]On Behalf Of Veni
> Markovski
> Sent: lundi, 28. avril 2014 17:20
> To: rhill at hill-a.ch; Halbersztadt Jozef (jothal); Borka Jerman Blazic
> Cc: Delegates Chapter; European Chapters; Chris Harris
> Subject: Re: [Chapter-delegates] Weekly European Regional Bureau
> Newsletter: EU Overview
> 
> 
> Richard,
> Would you be kind enough to point to the NetMundial document, or the 
> Tunis agenda, that confirms given veto power to anyone, be that private 
> companies, or governments, on issues, related to Internet governance, or 
> to "all issues", as you state it:
> 
> "Do you really want to give veto power to private companies for 
> all issues?"
> 
> I may have missed that part in the negotiations 10 years ago, or may 
> have forgotten it.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> 
> On 04/28/14 11:03, Richard Hill wrote:
> > I disagree. Please see the comment that I just posted in reply 
> to Milton's blog.
> >
> > Best,
> > Richard
> >
> 
> -- 
> 
> Best,
> Veni Markovski
> http://www.veni.com
> https://www.facebook.com/venimarkovski
> https://twitter.com/veni
> 
> The opinions expressed above are those of the
> author, not of any organizations, associated
> with or related to him in any given way.
> 
>