[Chapter-delegates] Board Election

Thu Apr 24 11:36:50 PDT 2014

+1 :)

I take the position of Alex as mine. 

Erick

El 24/04/2014, a las 12:52, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty at gmail.com> escribió:

> Christian, Vint, all,
> 
> to add to these points: 
> 
> The three NomComs I served in made quite specific recommendations to the Board to improve the elections (the implementation is for the Elections Committee.) One very important obstacle to finding a good set of candidates lies in the timetable for that process, and that is one of the main recommendations made about the elections process. 
> 
> Another is to increase the opportunities for debate among the candidates so that the voting chapters community can get to know them, or see their proposals in detail if they are known. Also this would serve to set a realistic expectation of how much chapters can expect to see the Trustees we vote for once they are elected.
> 
> Too often they vaporize away, in what may be an extreme interpretation that the Trustees' obligations are to ISOC as a whole. We don't have strict accountability processes, which may be fine (we see in other organizations that they can create more bureaucracy and simulation), but a bit of a memory where you come from and due to whom you sit in the Board is healthy. Equally applicable is to be able to measure yourself as a Trustee as your years of service pass, against the plans you announced.
> 
> IMO adding a blank-vote/abstention option is useful and desirable. 
> 
> Christian's point about the significance of an organic participation of Trustees in chapter work for the future of ISOC should not be ignored. I think we are at a crucial juncture for the new administration of ISOC. At the latest next week, looking at a post-facto analysis of NetMundial, we should start seeing some respectful attention, two-way exchanges and the rebirth of organic collaboration between Board, top management, staff, chapters and members (whether individual or organizational.) I've added Kathy Brown to the list of recipients in order to deliver this call decisively.
> 
> Yours,
> 
> Alejandro Pisanty
> 
> Alejandro Pisanty
> 
> 
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Christian de Larrinaga <cdel at firsthand.net> wrote:
> Vint - I don't know. 
> 
> However not knowing any candidates means taking on trust recommendations from those who do and that may limit the pool of an informed and engaged electorate.  
> 
> There is also a bit of a concern this time around to find candidates who have substantial "chapter" experience - preferably a founder or certainly an experienced leader. 
> 
> Although trustees represent all parts of ISOC there is a key priority to transform the roll of chapters in ISOC. The board needs to have that maturity of experience of chapters in their midst. 
> 
> If that doesn't happen in next eighteen to twenty four months then I worry that ISOC will be seen as promoting a local view globally rather than as a distributed community around the world that just happens to have a US registration and HQ. 
> 
> 
> Christian 
> 
> Vint Cerf wrote:
>> 
>> Abstention is a valid choice and there should be no prejudicial character to that. It may actually be useful to have a ballot that permits a chapter to submit a vote that effectively votes for no candidates (my interpretation of a "blank" ballot). Do others on the list believe that any significant fraction of non-voting chapters would submit a ballot if this option were available (versus simply not responding)?
>> 
>> v
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Peter,
>> 
>> I hope you didn't interpret my email asking Chapters to vote as interfering with the election.  My thinking is that it's important for as many chapters as possible to vote in the Board election.  Personally, I find it troubling that only half of the chapters (and similar turnout for org members) choose to vote.  Hopefully, the turnout will be higher this year.
>> 
>> Bob
>> 
>> On Apr 23, 2014, at 11:56 PM, Peter Koch <pk at ISOC.DE> wrote:
>> 
>> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:35:27PM -0500, Alejandro Pisanty wrote:
>> >
>> >> Vint's question does beg an answer from you. You may decide not to
>> >> interfere with the ongoing election process and answer him and Desiree in
>> >> private, then make your answer public when the polling closes. I don't
>> >> think you have a lot more choice.
>> >
>> > on my calendar it's the 24th today. That is 23 days past the first and one day left
>> > into the voting deadline.  To the latter: I, for one, take the liberty to exploit the
>> > full extent of the deadline the election committee came up with.  I am also
>> > extremely sensitive to "public pressure", especially when it comes to elections.
>> > That links to the former: It truly puzzles me to see a request to a chapter
>> > to justify their vote (to other chapters), even if that is an abstention.
>> > There are several reasons to abstain and sometimes even a qualified abstention
>> > might have more value than a ballot cast under "pressure".  I am pretty sure that several
>> > people on this list who are, sadly, much more qualified from personal experience
>> > than myself, would be able to share some depressing insight. Time to get a globe.
>> >
>> > -Peter
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
>> > to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
>> > Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
>> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
>> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
>> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
>> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
> 
> -- 
> Christian de Larrinaga 
> FBCS, CITP, MCMA 
> -------------------------
> @ FirstHand
> -------------------------
> +44 7989 386778
> cdel at firsthand.net 
> -------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>      Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
> Facultad de Química UNAM
> Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
> +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
> +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475
> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
> Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
> ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
> .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
> _______________________________________________
> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Erick Iriarte Ahon
Senior Partner 
Area de Nuevas Tecnologias

IRIARTE & ASOCIADOS
Dirección:    Miró Quesada 191, of. 510, Lima 01, Perú
Telefax:         (+511) 4270383
http://www.iriartelaw.com

Please, before printing think of our environment, a leaf can make a difference in a forest.
Por favor, antes de imprimir piense en nuestro medio ambiente. Una hoja puede hacer la diferencia en un bosque.

Statement of Confidentiality

The contents of this e-mail message and its attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) hereof.  In addition, this e-mail transmission may be confidential and it may be subject to privilege protecting communications between attorneys or solicitors and their clients.  If you are not the named addressee, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, you are directed not to read, disclose, reproduce, distribute, disseminate or otherwise use this e-mail.  Delivery of this message to any person other than the intended recipient(s) is not intended in any way to waive privilege or confidentiality.  If you have received this transmission in error, please alert the sender by reply e-mail; we also request that you immediately delete this message and its attachments, if any.

Declaracion de Confidencialidad

El contenido de este mensaje de correo electronico y de sus archivos adjuntos esta(n) dirigido(s) exclusivamente a el(los) destinatario(s) del mismo.  Adicionalmente, este mensaje y su contenido pueden ser privilegiados y estar cubiertos por la reserva profesional entre abogado y cliente.  Si usted no es el destinatario indicado, o si este mensaje le ha sido enviado por error, queda advertido en el sentido de no leer, divulgar, reproducir, distribuir, diseminar o utilizar este mensaje en forma alguna.  La entrega de este mensaje a cualquier persona diferente del(de los) destinatario(s) a quien(es) se ha dirigido no constituye una renuncia de privilegios o confidencialidad.  Si usted recibe este mensaje por error, por favor advierta al remitente mediante correo de respuesta; adicionalmente le solicitamos que inmediatamente proceda a suprimir este mensaje y sus archivos adjuntos, si los hubiere.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20140424/dd7aa227/attachment.htm>