[Chapter-delegates] Net Neutrality Vote In EU Parliament: A False Promise?

Tue Apr 1 04:54:11 PDT 2014

Thanks,

DG Connect spokesman Ryan Heath is as truthful as usual.

Diff between ITRE report and cross party amendments are in letter of La
Quadrature du Net to all MEPs:

http://www.laquadrature.net/wiki/Letter_to_MEPs_-_Plenary_vote_NN_%2803.04.2014%29
Best

JH

On 1 April 2014 13:26, Borka Jerman Blazic <borka at e5.ijs.si> wrote:

>
> Here it is:
>
> Telecoms firms brace for EU 'net neutrality' vote to limit service fees<http://europeanprivacyassociatin.us2.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=957214c9b3f3f5477a8fcc16d&id=248a9603a7&e=0b241720c2>
> *Reuters, Foo Yun Chee, 31 March 2014 *
>
> Regards,
>
> B.
>
> Dne 1.4.2014 13:12, piše Carlos Vera Quintana:
>
> Do you have the URL?
>
>  Thank you
>
> Carlos Vera Quintana
> 0988141143
> Sígueme @cveraq
>
> El 01/04/2014, a las 6:21, Borka Jerman Blazic <borka at e5.ijs.si> escribió:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> You are certainly right in general, however there was published yesterday
> an opinion that slightly differ
> (the Commission spokesman claims that the proposal guarantee no packet
> discrimination
> and net neutrality).    I am enclosing it!
>
> Regards,
>
> Borka
>
>
> Dne 1.4.2014 11:51, piše Halbersztadt Jozef (jothal):
>
>  Colleagues,
>
>
>  In two days the European Parliament will finally vote on the proposal
> for a Telecoms Single Market. This proposal was initially designed to
> deliver the promise of enshrining Net Neutrality as law across Europe. Yet
> unless the European Parliament rises to the challenge, it they may actually
> end up undermining net neutrality net through unclear and confusing
> legislation.
>
>
>  In fact the prime objective behind the Telecoms proposal, is not to
> ensure Net Neutrality, but promote so-called “specialised services”. This
> definition of “specialised services” put forward by the European Commission
> has been criticized for undermining core principles of nondiscrimination
> online. Its aims to create a “special lane for high consuming services”,
> such as video or social media services which are available today free of
> charge.
>
>
>  Under this definition of “specialised services,” telecommunications
> companies will be positioned to become internet gatekeepers, controlling
> innovation, strangling competition, and ultimately restricting freedom of
> expression online.
>
>
>  Furthermore, the regulation was presented by the Commission to the
> European Parliament only in September 2013, forcing the parliamentarians to
> adopt a ridiculously tight timeline to debate and vote before the upcoming
> elections in May 2014.
>
>
>  During this process, the European Commission ignored internal criticism
> regarding the harmful impacts the current Telecoms proposal will have on
> entrepreneurs and the fundamental rights of European citizens. The European
> Commission also ignored serious concerns raised by the Body of European
> Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC). This European agency in
> charge of promoting an efficient telecoms market that maximizes benefits
> for consumers and businesses alike, clearly identified the provisions
> included in the Telecoms proposal as being “counterproductive” to that end.
>
>
>  Despite the tight timeline, almost all parliamentary committees involved
> in the Telecoms proposal managed to add necessary improvements to the text
> and adopt provisions safeguarding against network discrimination.
> Regrettably, the Industry, Research and Energy (ITRE) Committee, in charge
> of the Telecoms proposal in the Parliament, rejected many of the
> improvements suggested by other committees in the final version of the
> proposal adopted prior to submission to the European Parliament's. When
> push came to shove, the ITRE Committee followed the Christian Democrat
> (EPP) rapporteur Pilar del Castillo questionable defense of the European
> Commission objectives at the expense of Net Neutrality.
>
>
>  Despite these setbacks, the European Parliament has an opportunity to
> prevent anti-competitive, anti-innovation policies by enshrining net
> neutrality into law across Europe in the Telecoms proposal’s final vote on
> April 3 by adopting the positive compromise amendments tabled by the
> Social-Democrats (S&D), the Greens (Greens/EFA), the United Left (GUE/NGL)
> and the Liberals (ALDE). The Parliament has a chance to stop network
> discrimination in its tracks by enshrining net neutrality into EU level
> law, as was already done in two EU countries, the Netherlands and Slovenia..
>
>
>  Citizens across the European Union can contact their representatives and
> urge them to vote for the alternative amendments and prevent the Internet
> to look more like cable TV, where your operator has total control over what
> you can access online, even charging you extra for certain services. A
> group of NGOs designed and launched a platform making to everyone very easy
> to call, email or fax members of the European Parliament.
>
> http://savetheinternet.eu/en/
>
>
>  In this action the citizen are informed that adopting of alternative
> provisions is the way to effectively enact Net Neutrality and ensure
> non-discrimination in the digital economy. While telecom companies (in
> particular those represented by the European Telecommunications Network
> Operators' Association (ETNO)) have been circulating misleading information
> about these amendments, they will in fact safeguard the ability of telecom
> operators to launch innovative “specialised services”, guarantee that
> innovative small and medium enterprises (SMEs) can benefit from a level
> playing-field, but also protect citizens' freedom of communication and
> consumers' freedom of choice.
>
>
>  More here:
>
>
> http://www.laquadrature.net/en/net-neutrality-vote-in-eu-parliament-meps-must-protect-the-internet
>
>  Regards
> Jozef Halbersztadt
>  --
> 'JotHal' jozef [dot] halbersztadt [at] gmail [dot] com
> Internet Society Poland http://www.isoc.org.pl
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
>
>
>
> --
> Prof.dr.Borka Jerman-Blažič Head, Laboratory for Open systems and Networks
> Jožef Stefan Institute and Faculty of Economics, Ljubljana University
> Slovenia tel. +386 1 477 3408 tel. +386 1 477 3756 mob. +386 41 678 410
>
>  <Telecoms firms brace for EU.docx>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
>
>
>
> --
> Prof.dr.Borka Jerman-Blažič Head, Laboratory for Open systems and Networks
> Jožef Stefan Institute and Faculty of Economics, Ljubljana University
> Slovenia tel. +386 1 477 3408 tel. +386 1 477 3756 mob. +386 41 678 410
>
> _______________________________________________
> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20140401/64654d78/attachment.htm>