[Chapter-delegates] STATEMENT: Internet Society Responds to Reports of the U.S. Government’s Circumvention of Encryption Technology
Elver Loho
elver.loho at gmail.com
Mon Sep 9 13:19:35 PDT 2013
It's good to see that ISOC is finally addressing the NSA spy scandal :)
Best,
Elver
elver.loho at gmail.com
+372 5661 6933
skype: elver.loho
On 9 September 2013 22:58, Wende Cover <cover at isoc.org> wrote:
> Internet Society Responds to Reports of the U.S. Government’s Circumvention
> of Encryption Technology
>
>
>
> The Internet Society is alarmed by continuing reports alleging systematic
> United States government efforts to circumvent Internet security mechanisms.
> The Internet Society President and CEO, Lynn St. Amour, said, “If true,
> these reports describe government programmes that undermine the technical
> foundations of the Internet and are a fundamental threat to the Internet’s
> economic, innovative, and social potential. Any systematic, state-level
> attack on Internet security and privacy is a rejection of the global,
> collaborative fabric that has enabled the Internet's growth to extend beyond
> the interests of any one country.”
>
>
>
> The Internet Society believes that global interoperability and openness of
> the Internet are pre-requisites for confidence in online interaction, they
> unlock the Internet as a forum for economic and social progress, and they
> are founded on basic assumptions of trust. We are deeply concerned that
> these principles are being eroded and that users' legitimate expectations of
> online security are being treated with contempt.
>
>
>
> As the institutional home of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), we
> believe that open and transparent processes are essential for security
> standardization, and result in better outcomes than any alternative
> approach. For example, protocols developed by the IETF are open for all to
> see, inspect, and verify, as are the open and inclusive processes by which
> they are specified.
>
>
>
> IETF Chairman Jari Arkko has strongly reiterated the IETF’s commitment to
> improving security in the Internet, and to seeking ways of improving
> security protocols in light of these new revelations and security threats.
> “The IETF has a long-standing commitment to openness and transparency in
> developing security protocols for the Internet, and sees this as critical to
> confidence in their use and implementation.” To read more, visit:
> http://www.ietf.org/blog/2013/09/security-and-pervasive-monitoring/.
>
>
>
> However, the open development of robust technical specifications is just one
> link in the chain. Security standards must be properly implemented and used.
> This is a wake-up call for technology developers and adopters alike, to
> reexamine what we can do to ensure that all links in the chain are equally
> strong. This is key to helping restore public trust and confidence in the
> Internet.
>
>
>
> The Internet has tremendous potential for economic and social good, but
> unless all stakeholders trust the Internet as a safe place for business,
> social interaction, academic enquiry, and self-expression, those economic
> and social benefits are put at risk. To fulfill its potential, the Internet
> must be underpinned by the right combination of technology, operational
> processes, legislation, policy, and governance. The recent reports suggest
> that U.S. Government programmes have systematically undermined some or all
> of those measures, and that is why we view the revelations with such grave
> concern.
>
>
>
> With this mind, we issue these calls to action for the global community:
>
>
>
> • To every citizen of the Internet: let your government representatives know
> that, even in matters of national security, you expect privacy, rule of law,
> and due process in any handling of your data.
>
>
>
> Security is a collective responsibility that involves multiple stakeholders.
> In this regard, we call on:
>
>
>
> •Those involved in technology research and development: use the openness of
> standards processes like the IETF to challenge assumptions about security
> specifications.
>
>
>
> •Those who implement the technology and standards for Internet security:
> uphold that responsibility in your work, and be mindful of the damage caused
> by loss of trust.
>
>
>
> •Those who develop products and services that depend on a trusted Internet:
> secure your own services, and be intolerant of insecurity in the
> infrastructure on which you depend.
>
>
>
> •To every Internet user: ensure you are well informed about good practice in
> online security, and act on that information. Take responsibility for your
> own security.
>
>
>
> At the Internet Society, we remain committed to advancing work in areas such
> as browser security, privacy settings, and digital footprint awareness in
> order to help users understand and manage their privacy and security. The
> citizens of the Internet deserve a global and open platform for
> communication built on solid foundations of security and privacy.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
> Chapter Portal (AMS): https://portal.isoc.org
More information about the Chapter-delegates
mailing list