[Chapter-delegates] Internet provider can be required to block copyright infringing website, says Advocate General

Joly MacFie joly at punkcast.com
Wed Nov 27 10:45:45 PST 2013


On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Frédéric Donck <donck at isoc.org> wrote:

> However, a specific blocking measure imposed on a provider relating to a
> specific website is not, in principle, disproportionate only because it
> entails not inconsiderable costs but can easily be circumvented without any
> special technical knowledge.


I am struggling to parse this sentence. It's reasonable because it's a
waste of time?

j



-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------
Joly MacFie  218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
 http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
 VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org
--------------------------------------------------------------
-
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20131127/a8832aa5/attachment.htm>


More information about the Chapter-delegates mailing list