[Chapter-delegates] Performance Standards, ISOC LoA

[Veni Markovski]

Ted,
Did I miss something - I believed the whole conversation about the LoA 
is already dead.
If there are chapters, willing to enter into any agreement with ISOC, 
which might cause them serious problems at home, and if ISOC is really 
pushing forward this, then perhaps you can create another mailing list, 
of the "willing" to sign into such a LoA, so that we don't get more 
confused.
I am positive our board will not approve signing such a LoA, and we will 
not lose anything by not being a recognized chapter of ISOC.
Once again - it is ISOC that needs the chapters, not the other way around.

v.




On 09/20/2012 12:25, Ted Mooney wrote:
>
> Norbert,
>
> I apologize for my delayed resonse to your many emails.
>
> I recall that there were two provisions that we said Chapters have 
> every right to expect and which will appear in the next version of the 
> Letter of Affiliation 1- Standards of performance for ISOC as well as 
> for Chapters.  These can be viewed in the latest draft Letter of 
> Affiliation which was sent to you and all Chapter Delegates and can be 
> view here: 
> https://fileshare.tools.isoc.org//groups/membership/public/LoA_DRAFT_Watermark.pdf 
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20120920/3433d2ca/attachment.htm>