[Chapter-delegates] Sally Wentworth on Core Internet Values

[Eduard Tric]

The one describing the relationships Isoc -Chaptes , presented during chapters workshop in London. I didn't followed the latest version , i think the last name is LOA , Letter of Affiliation. At point d) , we could add "logo , brand AND content".
Ed
Excerpt : 
Responsibilities of the Parties
The Standards of Performance identified in this Letter of Affiliation were developed by a joint task force consisting of representatives from the chapter community and the Internet Society, and are set forth below.
As to ISOC, it will: 
a) Appropriately assist the Chapter with developmental and operational tools and training to meet those Standards of Performance (as defined herein);
b) Provide communications channels and forums in which and through which the Chapter can share best practices, discuss Internet issues and identify opportunities for improvement;
c) Offer access to the ISOC membership database;
d) Authorize the Chapter’s use of the ISOC brand and logo and in so doing, reasonably act to protect the Internet Society trademarks; and
e) Provide ongoing guidance and support for Chapter activities through ISOC’s Regional Bureaus and chapter support programmes.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Wilkinson" <cw at christopherwilkinson.eu>
To: "Eduard Tric" <eduard.tric at isoc.ro>
Cc: joly at punkcast.com, "Chapter Delegates" <chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org>
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 9:36:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Chapter-delegates] Sally Wentworth on Core Internet Values

¿What affiliation document?

CW

On 26 Feb 2012, at 20:15, Eduard Tric wrote:

> Why make complicated when we can make simple ?
> Instead of specifying a (maybe different ) an external license for  
> every piece of Internetsociety.org content, one  can add a mention  
> in the affiliation document.
> "Chapters are encouraged (or free) to use (and translate if nedded)   
> Internet Society's content".
> I don't have a law background , but reading CC i understand that if  
> we use it, we give a free pass to use not only to chapters , but to   
> anyone ?
> Ed
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joly MacFie" <joly at punkcast.com>
> To: "Eric Burger" <eburger at standardstrack.com>
> Cc: "Chapter Delegates" <chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org>
> Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 9:03:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [Chapter-delegates] Sally Wentworth on Core Internet  
> Values
>
> I'm sorry. Not abundantly clear to me. My understanding is that CC
> explicitly permits use for any purpose with only the BY, NC, ND, or SA
> restrictions as specified by the licensor. There's nothing there that
> dispels me of that.
>
> j
>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Eric Burger <eburger at standardstrack.com 
> > wrote:
>> There is no need for a morals clause. In most jurisdictions, once  
>> something
>> is covered by copyright, the author by definition has moral rights  
>> unless
>> explicitly given away. The Creative Commons deeds, that is the  
>> plain English
>> description of the licenses, makes this abundantly clear. See
>> <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/>.
>>
>>
>> On Feb 26, 2012, at 1:17 PM, Joly MacFie wrote:
>>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> I'm not aware of a morals clause within CC. Can you elucidate?
>>
>> j
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Eric Burger
>> <eburger at standardstrack.com> wrote:
>>
>> The really important reason we want a Creative Commons' Copyright  
>> is we want
>>
>> to be able to deal with someone taking our words out of context. By  
>> having a
>>
>> Copyright, we would have some chance of ensuring people use our  
>> materials
>>
>> for good and not evil.
>>
>>
>> On Feb 24, 2012, at 6:36 AM, Khaled KOUBAA wrote:
>>
>>
>> Veni,
>>
>> You know that I personally like and advocate for the Creative  
>> Commons :)
>>
>> Khaled
>>
>>
>> Le 24/02/2012 12:34, Veni Markovski a écrit :
>>
>>
>> Khaled, not without copyright, but with Creative Commons -  
>> attribution. That
>>
>> makes life easier ;)
>>
>>
>> veni
>>
>>
>> On 2/24/2012 03:57, Khaled KOUBAA wrote:
>>
>>
>> I completely agree that we need to keep content that preach our  
>> values and
>>
>> principals available without copyright.
>>
>> Khaled
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Chapter-delegates mailing list
>>
>> Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
>>
>> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Chapter-delegates mailing list
>>
>> Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
>>
>> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>> Joly MacFie  218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
>> WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
>>  http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
>>  VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> -
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chapter-delegates mailing list
>> Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
>> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Joly MacFie  218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
> WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
>  http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
>  VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> _______________________________________________
> Chapter-delegates mailing list
> Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates
> _______________________________________________
> Chapter-delegates mailing list
> Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates