[Chapter-delegates] Sally Wentworth on Core Internet Values

[Eduard Tric]

Why make complicated when we can make simple ?
Instead of specifying a (maybe different ) an external license for every piece of Internetsociety.org content, one  can add a mention in the affiliation document.
"Chapters are encouraged (or free) to use (and translate if nedded)  Internet Society's content".
I don't have a law background , but reading CC i understand that if we use it, we give a free pass to use not only to chapters , but to  anyone ?
Ed

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joly MacFie" <joly at punkcast.com>
To: "Eric Burger" <eburger at standardstrack.com>
Cc: "Chapter Delegates" <chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org>
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 9:03:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Chapter-delegates] Sally Wentworth on Core Internet Values

I'm sorry. Not abundantly clear to me. My understanding is that CC
explicitly permits use for any purpose with only the BY, NC, ND, or SA
restrictions as specified by the licensor. There's nothing there that
dispels me of that.

j



On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Eric Burger <eburger at standardstrack.com> wrote:
> There is no need for a morals clause. In most jurisdictions, once something
> is covered by copyright, the author by definition has moral rights unless
> explicitly given away. The Creative Commons deeds, that is the plain English
> description of the licenses, makes this abundantly clear. See
> <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/>.
>
>
> On Feb 26, 2012, at 1:17 PM, Joly MacFie wrote:
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> I'm not aware of a morals clause within CC. Can you elucidate?
>
> j
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Eric Burger
> <eburger at standardstrack.com> wrote:
>
> The really important reason we want a Creative Commons' Copyright is we want
>
> to be able to deal with someone taking our words out of context. By having a
>
> Copyright, we would have some chance of ensuring people use our materials
>
> for good and not evil.
>
>
> On Feb 24, 2012, at 6:36 AM, Khaled KOUBAA wrote:
>
>
> Veni,
>
> You know that I personally like and advocate for the Creative Commons :)
>
> Khaled
>
>
> Le 24/02/2012 12:34, Veni Markovski a écrit :
>
>
> Khaled, not without copyright, but with Creative Commons - attribution. That
>
> makes life easier ;)
>
>
> veni
>
>
> On 2/24/2012 03:57, Khaled KOUBAA wrote:
>
>
> I completely agree that we need to keep content that preach our values and
>
> principals available without copyright.
>
> Khaled
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Chapter-delegates mailing list
>
> Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
>
> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Chapter-delegates mailing list
>
> Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
>
> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Joly MacFie  218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
> WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
>  http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
>  VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chapter-delegates mailing list
> Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates
>



-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------
Joly MacFie  218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
 http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
 VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org
--------------------------------------------------------------
-
_______________________________________________
Chapter-delegates mailing list
Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates