[Chapter-delegates] Internet and Constitution

[Alejandro Pisanty]

Khaled,

the primary example at a national level is FINLAND.

Alejandro Pisanty


.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .
      Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
UNAM, Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico

Tels. +52-(1)-55-5105-6044, +52-(1)-55-5418-3732

* Mi blog/My blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
* LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
* Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
* Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614

* Ven a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org.mx, ISOC http://www.isoc.org
*Participa en ICANN, http://www.icann.org
.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .


On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Khaled KOUBAA wrote:

> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:31:06 +0100
> From: Khaled KOUBAA <khaled.koubaa at gmail.com>
> To: chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
> Subject: Re: [Chapter-delegates] Internet and Constitution
> 
> Thank you Markus.
>> To define access to the Internet as a positive right is not without problems. This is best dealt with as a universal service obligation, as some European countries have done already.
>>
> Can you give e some example of which European country and what did they do ?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chapter-delegates mailing list
> Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates
>