[Chapter-delegates] Should DNSSEC be mandatory for all new gTLDs?

[Alejandro Pisanty]

eric,

we should all thank you for your pointed remark. "Opprotunity cost" 
anyone?

Turning points for the Internet's infrastructure are few and far between. 
Let's grab this one.

Yours,


Alejandro Pisanty


.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .
      Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
UNAM, Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico

Tels. +52-(1)-55-5105-6044, +52-(1)-55-5418-3732

* Mi blog/My blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
* LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
* Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
* Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614

* Ven a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org.mx, ISOC http://www.isoc.org
*Participa en ICANN, http://www.icann.org
.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .


On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Eric Burger wrote:

> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:47:47 -0400
> From: Eric Burger <eburger at standardstrack.com>
> To: Jordi Iparraguirre <ipa at josoc.cat>
> Cc: Chapter Delegates <chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org>
> Subject: Re: [Chapter-delegates] Should DNSSEC be mandatory for all new	gTLDs?
> 
> If it comes by default from the new gTLD's, the registrars will end up doing it by default.
>
> Otherwise, can you say IPv4? We will never get this off the ground and then wonder why nothing is happening.
>
> On Apr 14, 2011, at 1:05 PM, Jordi Iparraguirre wrote:
>
>> Olivier,
>>
>> i'm not speaking on behalf of isoc-cat chapter but for on behalf of
>> the .cat registry.
>> I agree on what's being said about being compulsory for new TLDs, but
>> the main issue right now is that Registrars are not offering it for
>> the current TLDs that already have it; they still say "there is no
>> demand"....
>>
>> I'd put the accent on getting the Registrars implementing it first
>> (also for IPv6)
>>
>> thanks for asking
>> jordi
>>
>>
>> 2011/4/7 Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>:
>>> The subject says it all.
>>> A discussion is currently taking place in ICANN's At-Large community
>>> whether DNSSEC should be or should not be mandatory for all new gTLDs.
>>>
>>> Proponents of the mandatory inclusion say that it will make every new
>>> gTLD more secure.
>>> Proponents of the optional inclusion say that it is too costly and
>>> should be chosen on a case by case basis, if it makes commercial sense.
>>>
>>> I'd like to hear the opinions of Internet Society chapters, please. Thanks!
>>>
>>> Olivier
>>>
>>> --
>>> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
>>> http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Chapter-delegates mailing list
>>> Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
>>> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jordi Iparraguirre
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chapter-delegates mailing list
>> Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
>> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates
>
>