[Chapter-delegates] Should DNSSEC be mandatory for all new gTLDs?

[Igor Mkrtumyan]

We think it should be mandatory. The time scale might be flexible.
Igor Mkrtumyan
ISOC AM

-----Original Message-----
From: chapter-delegates-bounces at elists.isoc.org
[mailto:chapter-delegates-bounces at elists.isoc.org] On Behalf Of Olivier MJ
Crepin-Leblond
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 2:07 AM
To: Chapter Delegates
Subject: [Chapter-delegates] Should DNSSEC be mandatory for all new gTLDs?

The subject says it all.
A discussion is currently taking place in ICANN's At-Large community
whether DNSSEC should be or should not be mandatory for all new gTLDs.

Proponents of the mandatory inclusion say that it will make every new
gTLD more secure.
Proponents of the optional inclusion say that it is too costly and
should be chosen on a case by case basis, if it makes commercial sense.

I'd like to hear the opinions of Internet Society chapters, please. Thanks!

Olivier

-- 
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
http://www.gih.com/ocl.html

_______________________________________________
Chapter-delegates mailing list
Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates