[Chapter-delegates] Statement on Open Internet proposal fromGoogle and Verizon

[Carlos M. Martinez]

 Why don´t we yet have BGP-over-SSL ? Seems pretty straightforward to me
and would solve most of these issues.

On 9/18/10 2:18 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
> On Sep 18, 2010, at 1:09 AM, Christian de Larrinaga wrote:
>
>> There does not seem to be a mechanism to ensure that a tunnelled transit packet is just routed and not mucked about with. Time for a tBGP?
> Well, that's kind of the point of DKIM, TLS, and IPsec. Depending on your application and layer, you can conceal the user payload entirely or put a checksum on it to ensure end to end integrity. Is that what you had in mind, or something different?
>
> tBGP? What did you have in mind?
> _______________________________________________
> Chapter-delegates mailing list
> Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20100918/da318296/attachment.htm>