[Chapter-delegates] Report from ITU Plenipotentiary Conference, week 1
Patrick Vande Walle
patrick at vande-walle.eu
Sun Oct 10 09:48:23 PDT 2010
+1
"Franck Martin" <franck at avonsys.com> wrote:
>I'm not saying that Bill being at ITU is a waste of resources, I'm
>saying that fighting the ITU is a waste of resources.
>
>While we try to counteract ITU plans, we don't spend our resources in
>the development of the Internet.
>
>Negative position vs Positive position, this is what I'm advocating.
>
>Franck Martin
>http://www.avonsys.com/
>http://www.facebook.com/Avonsys
>twitter: FranckMartin Avonsys
>
>Check your domain reputation: http://gurl.im/b69d4o
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Christopher Wilkinson" <cw at christopherwilkinson.eu>
>To: "Chapter Delegates" <chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org>
>Cc: "Executive Team" <exec-team at elists.isoc.org>
>Sent: Sunday, 10 October, 2010 4:22:57 AM
>Subject: Re: [Chapter-delegates] Report from ITU Plenipotentiary
>Conference, week 1
>
>Dear Franck:
>
>I think we know each other well enough for you not to be miffed that
>on this occasion we disagree a little bit.
>
>I consider that this is an excellent and well worthwhile use of Senior
>
>ISOC Staff resources, and of the ISOC budget. We need that.
>I think Bill and colleagues will have their work cut out to keep up
>with the whole of the ITU PP10 during the next two weeks.
>We look forward to their further reports.
>
>On the substance, there is clearly a good deal of education and
>clarification still needed in ITU on matters such as OSI and 'NGN'
>Also, if I may be allowed to quote a posting from our friend and
>critic, William Drake, recently on the Governance List:
>
><< It's a pity there are no CS (Civil Society) organizations prepared
>to test the (ITU) secretariat's frequent declarations of openness to
>CS participation and actually apply to be sector members in ITU-T or
>ITU-D;
>the only related entity participating is ISOC, which has made many
>good interventions against heavy intergovernmentalism but has not
>sought to be a vehicle for wider member/community/CS engagement etc.>>
>
>Perhaps faint praise, but praise nonetheless.
>
>Regards to you all,
>
>CW
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Chapter-delegates mailing list
>Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
>https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates
Best regards,
Cordialement,
Patrick Vande Walle
--
Sent from my mobile phone. Apologies for the typos and the brevity of the reply.
More information about the Chapter-delegates
mailing list