[Chapter-delegates] German high court: law ordering phone, e-mail traffic data retention violates constitution

[Monic]

It seems there is a world trend to consider a concepts'  stress between "privacy" against "security" ... Security's defenders argue that is necessary to fight against cybercrime....privacy's defenders consider a privacy intrusion.

 Honestly, I have not a final statement about this issue... I understand both point of view. However, I wonder how Parliament would find a balance between these two principles... I´m just "thinking loud" but, should we resing our privacy in the pursuit of security?
 
Regards,
Mónica
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Ed Traian Tric [mailto:eduard.tric at isoc.ro] 
Enviado el: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 9:13 AM
Para: Monic; 'Chapter Delegates'
CC: pubpol-wg at elists.isoc.org
Asunto: Re: [Chapter-delegates] German high court: law ordering phone, e-mail traffic data retention violates constitution

Hi Monic ,
Let's make an international "folk" festival , as the Romanian
Constitutional court declared last year unconstitutional the data
retention law in Romania.
Ed
Monic a scris:
> Thanks Rudy.
> 
> It´s a very interesting new.
> 
>  
> 
> Just to add some “folk” to the new… something similar happened in Argentina an year ago (February 2009) when the Supreme Court declares unconstitutional a law known as “The Spy Law” which order to telecommunication providers allowing intercept and forward “communications” (including its data) at request of Judicial Power… the situation become worse when a decree ruled that the “authorized” to intercept and analyze the communications was the Intelligent Department of the State.
> 
>  
> 
> Regards,
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Dra. Mónica Abalo Laforgia
> 
> Presidenta
> 
> ISOC-Ar Capítulo Argentina
> 
> www.isoc.org.ar  
> 
>  
> 
> De: chapter-delegates-bounces at elists.isoc.org [mailto:chapter-delegates-bounces at elists.isoc.org] En nombre de Rudi Vansnick
> Enviado el: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 8:06 AM
> Para: 'Chapter Delegates'; pubpol-wg at elists.isoc.org
> Asunto: [Chapter-delegates] German high court: law ordering phone, e-mail traffic data retention violates constitution
> 
>  
> 
> 
> German high court: law ordering phone, e-mail traffic data retention violates constitution
> 
> 
> MELISSA EDDY Associated Press Writer 
> 
> 5:23 AM EST, March 2, 2010
> 
> BERLIN (AP) — Germany's highest court on Tuesday overturned a law allowing authorities to retain data on telephone calls and e-mail traffic for help in tracking criminal networks.
> 
> A law ordering data on calls and e-mail exchanges be retained for six months for possible use by criminal authorities violated Germans' constitutional right to private correspondence and must be revised, the Federal Constitutional Court ruled.
> 
> In its ruling, the court said the law failed to sufficiently balance the need for personal privacy against that for providing security, although it did not rule out data retention in principle.
> 
> "The disputed instructions neither provided a sufficient level of data security, nor sufficiently limited the possible uses of the data," the court said.
> 
> Nearly 35,000 Germans had appealed to the court to overturn the law, which stems from a 2006 European Union anti-terrorism directive requiring telecommunications companies to retain phone data and Internet logs for a minimum of six months in case they are needed for criminal investigations.
> 
> The court upheld the EU directive, saying the problem lay instead with how the German parliament chose to interpret it.
> 
> Under the German law, which went into effect Jan. 2008, information about all calls from mobile or landline phones was retained for six months, including who called whom, from where and for how long.
> 
> The following year, that law was expanded to include the data surrounding all contact via e-mail.
> 
> Although the laws forbid authorities from retaining the contents of either form of communication, they met with fierce opposition from civil rights groups.
> 
> "Massive amounts of data about German citizens who pose no threat and are not suspects is being retained," Germany's commissioner for data security issues, Peter Schaar, told ARD's morning show.
> 
> Experts argue the information is crucial to being able to trace crimes involving heavy use of the Internet, including tracking terror networks and pursuing child pornography.
> 
> _______
> 
> Associated Press writer Verena Schmitt-Roschmann contributed to this report.
> 
> http://www.fox43.com/business/sns-ap-eu-germany-data-retention,0,1005335.story
> 
> Rudi Vansnick
> President Internet Society Belgium vzw
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Chapter-delegates mailing list
> Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
> http://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates