[Chapter-delegates] [SEEKING VIEWS] ISOC letter to ICANN re: DNS security and DNS CERT proposal

[Bill Graham]

Hi Joly,

I think it is a good condensation.  The only thing I might suggest is to change " 1) there is no evidence of increased vulnerability or inadequacy of current arrangements..."  As I read that it's not completely accurate -- there is cause for concern, but there is no sudden increase of vulnerability or sudden increase in attacks that would justify Beckstrom's statements in Nairobi.  Maybe thats just nit picking.  Otherwise, no diagreement

best
Bill

On 2010-04-15, at 3:25 PM, Joly MacFie wrote:

> I have posted a report on http://www.isoc-ny.org/?p=1548
> 
> Please let me know if I have misrepresented the statement.
> 
> j
> 
> 
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Bill Graham <graham at isoc.org> wrote:
>> I want to thank all of you who commented in response to the note below.  I received a large number of very helpful suggestions on the issues raised, which I very much appreciate.  I believe you will see them reflected in our submission, which took the form of a letter from Lynn St. Amour to the ICANN Board, also posted to the ICANN Consultation pages on the proposals.  I have attached a copy here, FYI.
>> 
>> best regards
>> 
>> Bill
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Joly MacFie  917 442 8665 Skype:punkcast
> WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
> http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
> ---------------------------------------------------------------