[Chapter-delegates] The Future Internet

[artur]

Dear Fatima and friends,
I strongly recommend the ISOC discussion document Preserving the User 
Centric Internet,
http://www.isoc.org/pubpolpillar/docs/usercentric_en_2008.pdf

In Spain, i2cat Foundation, in collaboration with the Catalan chapter of 
ISOC, is developing the discussion about the Future Internet considering 
this  document as  a basic guideline. This approach is allowing to focus 
in how new users and usages are reinventing the Internet, like 
green-clean-Internet, arts-culture Internet, or Internet of health.

In this vision,  local Internet Society chapters, more closed to the 
Internet users, could play a more strategic role in the next Internet.

Best
Artur.

Fatima Lasay escribió:
> Dear Oliver and  Sivasubramanian,
>
> I am very interested in questions of "The Future of the Internet" and of
> the Internet model/s.
>
> Our founding member Rodel Urani has also earlier posed a question on our
> mailing list about the Internet model - and asks *why* is it modelled as
> such?
>
> I am very interested in funamental questions such as these.
>
> By the way, do you have a text of the Kelly video? I use dial-up and
> cannot access video.
>
>
> Oliver, if you are organizing an on-line discussion abou the ITU
> document, I would also be interested.
>
> Best wishes,
> Fatima Lasay
> Internet Society Philippines
>
>
>
> Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 10:34:08 +0530
> From: Sivasubramanian Muthusamy <isolatedn at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Chapter-delegates] The Future Internet
> To: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>
> Cc: Chapter-delegates <Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org>
>
> Hello Oliver,
>
> What are the visions of the Internet Future that are in conformity 
> with the
> Internet values?  Lynn St Amour has talked about the Internet Model as 
> part
> of her speeches in various forums, Vint Cerf has briefly outlined a
> prediction, but is there an ISOC-like document on the Future of Internet?
> Or, more precisely, what OUGHT TO be the Future of the Internet? Has ISOC
> spelt out its vision? Or are there any documents that ISOC considers as
> outlines in conformity with the Internet values?As we see wrong ideas 
> such
> as the ITU's erroneous ideas on the Future of Internet gets published 
> it is
> important, not only to counter that by comments and email debates, but 
> more
> effectively by preparing a blue print, complete with arguments as to how
> telecoms and other businesses can prosper well within the Internet 
> Model and
> with arguments to show how Security concerns could be addressed without
> introducing draconian legislations. If we don't have one, it is time we
> prepared one.
>
> Visions of the future are always fascinating, but only a very few 
> people can
> see through how a certain program or proposal would upset the Internet
> model. I have recently posted two videos in the chapter blog
> http://isocmadras.blogspot.com from TED. One is a Talk by Kevin Kelly 
> on the
> "next 5000 days of the Web", which is very interesting as a blog post. 
> There
> are several such resources, but which of these visions could be dubbed as
> the right concepts and inspirations?  What is right and what is wrong?
>
> May be we need an INET with the theme "Future of the Internet"?
>
>
> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
> http://turiya.wordpress.com
> Blog: http://isocmadras.blogspot.com
>
> facebook: http://is.gd/x8Sh
> LinkedIn: http://is.gd/x8U6
> Twitter: http://is.gd/x8Vz
> Airtel: +91 99524 03099
>
>
> 2009/5/7 Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>
>
> >  Hey everyone,
> >
> > The ITU has recently released a free document (Hip hip hurray! 
> Finally a
> > free document from ITU !), describing their vision of The Future 
> Internet.
> > This might not be their sole vision, but it is one vision.
> >
> > http://www.itu.int/oth/T230100000A/en
> >
> > I have found the document to be interesting reading. However, I have 
> found
> > several instances where a question is raised for the sole purpose to 
> instill
> > doubt in the reader's mind wrt the Internet being able to evolve. Is 
> this a
> > special writing style? Is this wanted? There are plenty of question 
> marks
> > looming about the subject.
> > Another interesting part is Annex A, where the authors provide a 
> list of
> > the current ITU-T study groups working on Internet-related matters. 
> It looks
> > like a well orchestrated choice of subjects. Is ITU planting its 
> fence posts
> > in the standards field, in time for future networks? Indeed, can I 
> ask a
> > burning question: is there Internet space for two standards bodies - 
> IETF &
> > ITU - in those subjects?
> >
> > Of particular importance is the last line of the conclusion:
> >
> > "As a result, this Report has surveyed the debate over Internet
> > architecture, and identified key emerging trends and features of the
> > Internet, in an attempt to provide pointers for future standards 
> work for
> > consideration by the ITU-T membership and the broader standards 
> community. "
> >
> > So the ITU's back on the forefront of Internet-related standards - 
> or at
> > least, it plans to be.
> >
> > I'd be interested in hearing what others think about this document.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > --
> > Olivier MJ Cr?pin-Leblond, PhD
> > http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chapter-delegates mailing list
> Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
> http://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates