[Chapter-delegates] ISOC flash: US Department of Commerce

[Veni Markovski]

I agree that a common position may be a good idea - and if there are 
chapters which want to express something in particular, they can do it 
independently.

best,
veni


Narelle.Clark at csiro.au wrote:
> Khaled
> We in ISOC-AU will probably submit a response of our own, but I would strongly support any consensus submission that went in from the chapters.
>
> Where is all this up to?
>
> How would we go about discussing and compiling a response?
>
> What are the headline issues?
>
> ...???
>
>
> Narelle
> VP ISOC-AU
>  
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: chapter-delegates-bounces at elists.isoc.org [mailto:chapter-delegates-bounces at elists.isoc.org] On Behalf Of Khaled KOUBAA
> Sent: Saturday, 25 April 2009 6:08 PM
> To: chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
> Subject: Re: [Chapter-delegates] ISOC flash: US Department of Commerce
>
> Bil ,
> Thank you for the update and the information.
> As I understood from your email there will be an internal consultation 
> inside ISOC Orgs and Chapters before that ISOC announce it's official 
> position in regards with the JPA ?
> Thanks
> Khaled
>   
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 5
>> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:35:34 -0400 (EDT)
>> From: "Bill Graham" <graham at isoc.org>
>>
>> The Department of Commerce has now released its notice of inquiry
>> (NOI) "regarding the upcoming expiration of the JPA with ICANN."
>>  Comments are due ON OR BEFORE JUNE 8, 2009.  It is well buried
>> on the Federal Register site, so I have downloaded it and
>> attached it here.
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> Chapter-delegates mailing list
> Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
> http://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates
>
>