[Chapter-delegates] press release to be sent shortly
Alejandro Pisanty
apisan at servidor.unam.mx
Tue Jun 17 22:52:00 PDT 2008
Dear Sivasubramanian,
an interesting subject to discuss face-to-face as well as online.
But, identifying as "technical community" has definitely been the norm in
the post-WSIS context, and helped save the Internet quite a bunch of
unnecessary trouble, big-time.
So I would rather ask whether other policy-oriented organizations are
equally committed to the end-to-end and any-to-any principles of the
Internet. Compare the civil-society/TUAC statement and the technical
community's, both for the OECD meeting. The subtle differences among them
mean a lot. Recognizing that there is technical and standards work to be
done makes a huge difference. Asking alone, versus asking and being able
to provide, is the name of that difference.
This statement does not detract from the fact that, especially in chapters
outside the US/Europe where we don't have that many IETFers, we see the
need to develop policy-oriented stuff and intervene in public life as an
activity equally important to the development of technical standards, and
a more pressing need in our lives.
I would also add that besides the IETF (plus IAB etc.), ISOC, ICANN, and
the RIRs, already mentioned, the "technical community" includes many
ccTLDs and a bunch of other organizations whose role is not purely
technical, yet are comfortable with the umbrella designation.
And, if you want to see a bitter, bitter fight about this designation that
might convince you of keeping it, take a look at the discussions in the
"Internet Governance Caucus" in which the nastiness of the other side
exhibits so many problems that you may almost start getting a mystical
view of the term!
Alejandro Pisanty
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
UNAM, Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
*Mi blog/My blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
*LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
*Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, www.isoc.org
Participa en ICANN, www.icann.org
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy wrote:
> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:52:22 -0700
> From: Sivasubramanian Muthusamy <isolatedn at gmail.com>
> To: Sebastian Ricciardi <sricciardi at fibertel.com.ar>
> Cc: ISOC Chapter Delegates <chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org>
> Subject: Re: [Chapter-delegates] press release to be sent shortly
>
> Hello Gerald Ross,
>
> That was not to belitte the efforts to come up with a press release.
> If it it a joint press release nothing much could be changed now, and
> it it might not be wise to pay attention to the finer aspects.
>
> ISOC needs to be referred to differently, will write a note on this in
> a separate conttext.
>
> Thank you.
> Sivasubramanian M
>
>
> On 6/17/08, Sebastian Ricciardi <sricciardi at fibertel.com.ar> wrote:
>> Indeed!
>>
>> S.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: chapter-delegates-bounces at elists.isoc.org
>> [mailto:chapter-delegates-bounces at elists.isoc.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker
>> Sent: Martes, 17 de Junio de 2008 02:26 p.m.
>> To: Gerard Ross
>> Cc: ISOC Chapter Delegates
>> Subject: Re: [Chapter-delegates] press release to be sent shortly
>>
>>
>> On Jun 17, 2008, at 3:19 AM, Gerard Ross wrote:
>>> Thanks for your suggestion. However, I believe the name Internet
>>> technical community came from the OECD, in the preparations for
>>> this event, and the request they made to ISOC to coordinate this
>>> particular stakeholder forum.
>>
>> it goes further. In the IGF and WSIS discussions, the NRO, IETF,
>> ICANN, and various other infrastructure organizations (of which ISOC
>> is one) have been collectively referred to as the ITC. Inventing a
>> new name here mostly results in a dilution of the message, as the
>> hearers are likely to answer "who's that?"
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chapter-delegates mailing list
>> Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
>> http://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG.
>> Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.3.0/1505 - Release Date: 16/06/2008
>> 07:20 a.m.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chapter-delegates mailing list
>> Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
>> http://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates
>>
>
>
> --
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/sivasubramanianmuthusamy
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chapter-delegates mailing list
> Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
> http://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates
>
More information about the Chapter-delegates
mailing list